Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Colebrook Bosson Saunders APACColebrook Bosson Saunders APAC
VS
The ODP CorporationThe ODP Corporation
Colebrook Bosson Saunders APAC

Colebrook Bosson Saunders APAC

12 Georgiana St, Docklands, 3008, AU

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
755/1000Fair

At Colebrook Bosson Saunders we strive for new ways to enhance user experience through the seamless connection of people and technology. We believe passionately in design, focusing on creating products that integrate people with technology to increase user comfort, perf...

NAICS:45321
NAICS Definition:Office Supplies and Stationery Stores
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:19
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
The ODP Corporation

The ODP Corporation

Boca Raton, US

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
775/1000Fair

The ODP Corporation (NASDAQ:ODP) is a leading provider of products and services through an integrated business-to-business (B2B) distribution platform and omnichannel presence, which includes world-class supply chain and distribution operations, dedicated sales professi...

NAICS:45321
NAICS Definition:Office Supplies and Stationery Stores
Employees:27,908
Subsidiaries:5
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Colebrook Bosson Saunders APAC

Colebrook Bosson Saunders APAC

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
The ODP Corporation

The ODP Corporation

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Office Equipment Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Colebrook Bosson Saunders APAC in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Retail Office Equipment Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The ODP Corporation in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Colebrook Bosson Saunders APAC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Colebrook Bosson Saunders APAC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - The ODP Corporation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The ODP Corporation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Colebrook Bosson Saunders APAC

Colebrook Bosson Saunders APAC

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
The ODP Corporation

The ODP Corporation

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Colebrook Bosson Saunders APAC company and The ODP Corporation company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Colebrook Bosson Saunders APAC company and The ODP Corporation company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Colebrook Bosson Saunders APAC company and The ODP Corporation company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Colebrook Bosson Saunders APAC company and The ODP Corporation company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Colebrook Bosson Saunders APAC company and The ODP Corporation company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Colebrook Bosson Saunders APAC company and The ODP Corporation company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Colebrook Bosson Saunders APAC company and The ODP Corporation company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Colebrook Bosson Saunders APAC company and The ODP Corporation company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Colebrook Bosson Saunders APAC company and The ODP Corporation company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Colebrook Bosson Saunders APAC company and The ODP Corporation company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Colebrook Bosson Saunders APAC company and The ODP Corporation company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Colebrook Bosson Saunders APAC and The ODP Corporation, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Colebrook Bosson Saunders APAC and The ODP Corporation, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Colebrook Bosson Saunders APAC or The ODP Corporation ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Colebrook Bosson Saunders APAC or The ODP Corporation ?
Between Colebrook Bosson Saunders APAC and The ODP Corporation, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Colebrook Bosson Saunders APAC and The ODP Corporation, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-110873
SUMMARY

Heym from 0.0.55 before 0.0.121 contains a privilege escalation vulnerability that allows shared collaborators to overwrite a workflow's error_workflow_id because the field is missing from OWNER_ONLY_EXECUTION_FIELDS. Attackers can point the error workflow to their own workflow with an HTTP node, and when the parent workflow errors the owner's decrypted credentials are injected and exfiltrated.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-14
UPDATED
Date2026-10-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-110872
SUMMARY

Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.10 contains a quadratic complexity denial of service vulnerability in the SMTP client reply parser in SMTPConnection._onData and isPartialResponse. A malicious SMTP server or on-path attacker can stream continuation lines without a completion line before authentication, blocking the Node.js event loop and exhausting memory.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-14
UPDATED
Date2026-10-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.2
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-110871
SUMMARY

Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.10 contains a denial of service vulnerability in MessageParser.parseHeaders that allows users to exhaust CPU through quadratic header unfolding. Attackers can supply large recipient lists or long headers that fold into tens of thousands of continuation lines, blocking the Node.js event loop during DKIM signing.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-14
UPDATED
Date2026-10-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-110870
SUMMARY

Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.13 contains an improper input validation vulnerability in its address parser that fails to strip RFC 5322 comments inside angle-bracket addresses. Attackers can supply recipients like a display name with a parenthesized comment in the domain, so illegal characters reach envelope.to and RCPT TO, causing rejected delivery or parser interpretation conflicts that bypass domain allow-lists.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-14
UPDATED
Date2026-10-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-110869
SUMMARY

Nodemailer 3.0.0 before 10.0.13 has a regular expression denial of service in SMTPConnection._actionEHLO, whose four AUTH mechanism detection regexes contain overlapping whitespace sub-patterns that backtrack quadratically. A malicious or man-in-the-middle SMTP server can reply to EHLO with 250-AUTH, a long whitespace run and a non-matching token, blocking the Node.js event loop for tens of seconds to hours before authentication.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-14
UPDATED
Date2026-10-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9