Comparison Overview
CBRE Norway

CBRE Norway
Bryggegata 9, Oslo, 0250, NO
Last Update: 25/04/2026
CBRE Group, Inc. (NYSE:CBRE), et Fortune 500 og S&P 500 selskap med hovedkontor i Dallas, er verdens største rådgiver, megler, forvalter og investor innenfor næringseiendom (basert på omsetning i 2024). Selskapet har mer enn 140 000 ansatte som betjener kunder i over 10...

CoStar Group
1201 Wilson Blvd, Arlington, Virginia, US, 22209
Last Update: 01/04/2026
CoStar Group (NASDAQ: CSGP) is a global leader in commercial real estate information, analytics, online marketplaces, and 3D digital twin technology. Founded in 1986, CoStar Group is dedicated to digitizing the world’s real estate, empowering all people to discover prop...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

CBRE Norway







CoStar Group






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Real Estate Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for CBRE Norway in 2026.
Incidents vs Real Estate Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for CoStar Group in 2026.
Incident History - CBRE Norway (X = Date, Y = Severity)
CBRE Norway cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - CoStar Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)
CoStar Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

CBRE Norway

CoStar Group
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.