Comparison Overview
CBRE Czech Republic

CBRE Czech Republic
Palladium, Prague, 110 00, CZ
Last Update: 30/03/2026
CBRE Group, Inc. (NYSE:CBRE), a Fortune 500 and S&P 500 company headquartered in Dallas, is the world’s largest commercial real estate services and investment firm (based on 2022 revenue). The company has approximately 115,000 employees (excluding Turner & Townsend empl...

Keller Williams Realty, LLC
Suite 400, Austin, TX, US, 78746
Last Update: 18/09/2026
Austin, Texas-based Keller Williams, the world’s largest real estate franchise by agent count, has more than 1,100 offices and 176,000 agents. The franchise is also No. 1 in units and sales volume in the United States. Since 1983, the company has cultivated an agent-c...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

CBRE Czech Republic







Keller Williams Realty, LLC






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Real Estate Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for CBRE Czech Republic in 2026.
Incidents vs Real Estate Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Keller Williams Realty, LLC in 2026.
Incident History - CBRE Czech Republic (X = Date, Y = Severity)
CBRE Czech Republic cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Keller Williams Realty, LLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Keller Williams Realty, LLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

CBRE Czech Republic

Keller Williams Realty, LLC
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.
IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.
IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.
IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.