Comparison Overview
CBRE Asia Pacific

CBRE Asia Pacific
2 Tanjong Katong Road , Singapore, Singapore, SG, 436990
Last Update: 05/04/2026
CBRE Asia Pacific is an integral part of CBRE Group, the world’s largest commercial real estate services firm. Over 20,000 professionals focus on the alignment of our client’s overall business objectives with their real estate requirements. The Asia Pacific region comp...

Colliers
1140 Bay St, Suite 4000, Toronto, Ontario, CA, M5S 2B4
Last Update: 27/05/2026
We are a global diversified professional services and investment management company operating through three industry-leading businesses: Commercial Real Estate, Engineering, and Investment Management. With greater than a 30-year track record of consistent growth and str...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

CBRE Asia Pacific







Colliers






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Real Estate Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for CBRE Asia Pacific in 2026.
Incidents vs Real Estate Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Colliers in 2026.
Incident History - CBRE Asia Pacific (X = Date, Y = Severity)
CBRE Asia Pacific cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Colliers (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Colliers cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

CBRE Asia Pacific

Colliers
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.