Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Cavium IncCavium Inc
VS
MediaTekMediaTek
Cavium Inc

Cavium Inc

2315 North 1st Street, San Jose, California, 95131, US

Last Update: 22/01/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.cavium.com
758/1000Fair

We are excited to announce that Marvell Semiconductor has acquired Aquantia! Follow Marvell: http://bit.ly/LN-Marvell Cavium (NASDAQ: CAVM) is a provider of highly integrated semiconductor processors that enable intelligent networking, communications, storage, video an...

NAICS:3344
NAICS Definition:Semiconductor and Other Electronic Component Manufacturing
Employees:802
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
MediaTek

MediaTek

No.1, Dusing Rd. 1, Hsin-Chu, 30078, TW

Last Update: 22/08/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.mediatek.com
832/1000Good

MediaTek Incorporated (TWSE: 2454) is a global fabless semiconductor company that enables nearly 2 billion connected devices a year. We are a market leader in developing innovative systems-on-chip (SoC) for mobile, home entertainment, connectivity and IoT products. Our ...

NAICS:3344
NAICS Definition:Semiconductor and Other Electronic Component Manufacturing
Employees:14,187
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Cavium Inc

Cavium Inc

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
MediaTek

MediaTek

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Semiconductor Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cavium Inc in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Semiconductor Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

MediaTek has 2.91% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Cavium Inc (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cavium Inc cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - MediaTek (X = Date, Y = Severity)

MediaTek cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Cavium Inc

Cavium Inc

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
MediaTek

MediaTek

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
TANKRANOTMEDCOI1773311566

FAQ

Between Cavium Inc company and MediaTek company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Cavium Inc company and MediaTek company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Cavium Inc company and MediaTek company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Cavium Inc company and MediaTek company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Cavium Inc company and MediaTek company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Cavium Inc company and MediaTek company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Cavium Inc company and MediaTek company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Cavium Inc company and MediaTek company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Cavium Inc company and MediaTek company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Cavium Inc company and MediaTek company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Cavium Inc company and MediaTek company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Cavium Inc and MediaTek, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Cavium Inc and MediaTek, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Cavium Inc or MediaTek ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Cavium Inc or MediaTek ?
Between Cavium Inc and MediaTek, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Cavium Inc and MediaTek, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-16174
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified about a potential gap in Netskope Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) running on Windows systems. Successful exploitation of the gap could potentially allow a privileged user to send a crafted message to the EPDLP process port to trigger an integer overflow, leading to memory corruption. Successful exploitation would require the EPDLP module to be enabled in the client configuration, and that Memory Integrity is disabled. A successful exploit could potentially result in a denial-of-service, arbitrary code execution, or privilege escalation on the local machine.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-16172
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified of an out-of-bounds heap read affecting the Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) service of the Netskope Client. A local standard user could potentially send a specially crafted message that is not properly validated with a bounds check, likely crashing the kernel driver handler. Successful exploitation could potentially crash the EPDLP service, temporarily interrupting DLP enforcement. A successful exploit could potentially also reveal per-boot memory layout information to unauthorized users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-87958
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 is vulnerable to a denial of service where a specific functionality on a Db2 server can be disabled by a privileged user under certain conditions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-86093
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an attacker with the ability to control or impersonate a DRDA server endpoint to execute arbitrary commands on Db2 clients due to a stack-based buffer overflow that improperly copies user-controlled data into a fixed-size stack buffer without bounds checking.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-86087
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an authenticated user to send a specially crafted request to write arbitrary files on the system.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8