Comparison Overview

Cavanaugh & Quesada, PLC

VS

Transportation Law Group

Cavanaugh & Quesada, PLC

1027 S Washington Ave, Royal Oak, Michigan, 48067, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27

Cavanaugh & Quesada, PLC is a business and construction law firm in Royal Oak, Michigan. Our firm was founded in 2008. We’re business attorneys who specialize in construction. We’re involved in virtually all aspects of public and private construction -- from design to demolition. Our clients are design professionals, general and specialty contractors, and equipment suppliers. If you want a law firm specializing in cases like yours and attorneys who can help you reach an outcome that works for your business, call us. We’ll treat your business the same way we like to be treated. We’ll meet with you and assess your needs with no obligation. If we can help you, we'll tell you how. We’ll review the facts, look at costs, risks, and options, and develop a plan you'll understand. If we can’t help you, we’ll tell you that too and help you find someone who can. Call us at (248) 543-8320 or submit an inquiry through our website to schedule time to discuss your legal problems.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 5
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Transportation Law Group

Two PPG Place, Pittsburgh, 15222, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28

The Transportation Law Group at Dickie, McCamey & Chilcote concentrates in helping long-haul trucking companies and LTL carriers manage the day-to-day risks of their businesses. The members of our Group carefully track the case law and regulations of greatest importance to the freight transportation industry. This ongoing research, coupled with our years of trial experience, allows us to provide targeted legal guidance to businesses that specialize in the movement of freight by way of highway and marine.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: None
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cavanaugh-&-quesada-plc.jpeg
Cavanaugh & Quesada, PLC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/transportation-law-group.jpeg
Transportation Law Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Cavanaugh & Quesada, PLC
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Transportation Law Group
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cavanaugh & Quesada, PLC in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Transportation Law Group in 2025.

Incident History — Cavanaugh & Quesada, PLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cavanaugh & Quesada, PLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Transportation Law Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Transportation Law Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cavanaugh-&-quesada-plc.jpeg
Cavanaugh & Quesada, PLC
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/transportation-law-group.jpeg
Transportation Law Group
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Cavanaugh & Quesada, PLC company and Transportation Law Group company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Transportation Law Group company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Cavanaugh & Quesada, PLC company.

In the current year, Transportation Law Group company and Cavanaugh & Quesada, PLC company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Transportation Law Group company nor Cavanaugh & Quesada, PLC company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Transportation Law Group company nor Cavanaugh & Quesada, PLC company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Transportation Law Group company nor Cavanaugh & Quesada, PLC company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Cavanaugh & Quesada, PLC company nor Transportation Law Group company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Cavanaugh & Quesada, PLC nor Transportation Law Group holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Transportation Law Group company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Cavanaugh & Quesada, PLC company.

Neither Cavanaugh & Quesada, PLC nor Transportation Law Group holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Cavanaugh & Quesada, PLC nor Transportation Law Group holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Cavanaugh & Quesada, PLC nor Transportation Law Group holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Cavanaugh & Quesada, PLC nor Transportation Law Group holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Cavanaugh & Quesada, PLC nor Transportation Law Group holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Cavanaugh & Quesada, PLC nor Transportation Law Group holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X