Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Catalyst RCM - Better Results. No ComparisonCatalyst RCM - Better Results. No Comparison
VS
eClerxeClerx
Catalyst RCM - Better Results. No Comparison

Catalyst RCM - Better Results. No Comparison

Katy , 77493, US

Last Update: 18/03/2026

View Profile
492/1000Critical

We are your Revenue Partner. Not Just A Billing Company. - If we could increase your revenue by 10%, is that worth 1 hour of your time? - Is transparency missing from the relationship with your current biller? - Are you absolutely confident you’re collecting every dolla...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:23
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
eClerx

eClerx

29 Bank Street, Fort, 1st Floor, Mumbai, Maharashtra, IN, 400 023

Last Update: 08/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.eclerx.com
758/1000Fair

eClerx is a productized services company, bringing together people, technology and domain expertise to amplify business results. Our mission is to set the benchmark for client service and success in our industry. Our vision is to be the innovation partner of choice for ...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:19,162
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Catalyst RCM - Better Results. No Comparison

Catalyst RCM - Better Results. No Comparison

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
eClerx

eClerx

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Catalyst RCM - Better Results. No Comparison in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for eClerx in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Catalyst RCM - Better Results. No Comparison (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Catalyst RCM - Better Results. No Comparison cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - eClerx (X = Date, Y = Severity)

eClerx cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Catalyst RCM - Better Results. No Comparison

Catalyst RCM - Better Results. No Comparison

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
CAT1771961762
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
KORVANCAT1770667690
eClerx

eClerx

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Catalyst RCM - Better Results. No Comparison company and eClerx company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Catalyst RCM - Better Results. No Comparison company and eClerx company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Catalyst RCM - Better Results. No Comparison company and eClerx company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Catalyst RCM - Better Results. No Comparison company and eClerx company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Catalyst RCM - Better Results. No Comparison company and eClerx company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Catalyst RCM - Better Results. No Comparison company and eClerx company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Catalyst RCM - Better Results. No Comparison company and eClerx company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Catalyst RCM - Better Results. No Comparison company and eClerx company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Catalyst RCM - Better Results. No Comparison company and eClerx company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Catalyst RCM - Better Results. No Comparison company and eClerx company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Catalyst RCM - Better Results. No Comparison company and eClerx company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Catalyst RCM - Better Results. No Comparison and eClerx, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Catalyst RCM - Better Results. No Comparison and eClerx, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Catalyst RCM - Better Results. No Comparison or eClerx ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Catalyst RCM - Better Results. No Comparison or eClerx ?
Between Catalyst RCM - Better Results. No Comparison and eClerx, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Catalyst RCM - Better Results. No Comparison and eClerx, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-103591
SUMMARY

DeepWiki-Open through commit d92819a contains an unauthenticated arbitrary file read vulnerability in the GET /codemap/file endpoint via the repo_url parameter. Attackers can supply a non-URL repo_url value to bypass path containment checks and read any file accessible to the API process by specifying absolute file paths.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-30
UPDATED
Date2026-09-30
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-103590
SUMMARY

QloApps through 1.7.0 contains a reflected cross-site scripting vulnerability in the back-office room type editor's length of stay fields. Attackers can induce authenticated administrators to submit crafted POST requests with malicious payloads in restriction_min_los and restriction_max_los parameters, executing arbitrary JavaScript in the victim's administrative session.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-30
UPDATED
Date2026-09-30
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
2.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3
CVE-2026-103589
SUMMARY

QloApps through 1.7.0 contains a reflected cross-site scripting vulnerability in the back-office room type editor that fails to escape room_num, floor, and comment field values in input attributes. Attackers can induce authenticated back-office users to submit crafted POST requests with malicious payloads to execute arbitrary JavaScript in the victim's administrative session.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-30
UPDATED
Date2026-09-30
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
2.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3
CVE-2026-103588
SUMMARY

QloApps through 1.7.0 contains a reflected cross-site scripting vulnerability in the exceptions field of the back-office Transplant a module form. Attackers can craft a malicious link containing JavaScript payload in the exceptions parameter that executes in an authenticated administrator's session when the victim follows the link.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-30
UPDATED
Date2026-09-30
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
2.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3
CVE-2026-103587
SUMMARY

QloApps through 1.7.0 contains a reflected cross-site scripting vulnerability in the back-office Hotel Reservation System Book Now search, where date_to and id_room_type parameters are copied into template variables without validation. Attackers can craft a malicious link containing JavaScript payload in these parameters that executes in an authenticated administrator's session when the victim follows the link.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-30
UPDATED
Date2026-09-30
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
2.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3