Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Castorama Polska Sp. z o.o.Castorama Polska Sp. z o.o.
VS
Ross Stores, Inc.Ross Stores, Inc.
Castorama Polska Sp. z o.o.

Castorama Polska Sp. z o.o.

ulica Krakowiakow 78, Warszawa, Woj. Mazowieckie, 02-255, PL

Last Update: 01/12/2025

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.castorama.pl/
761/1000Fair

Castorama to coś więcej niż sieć sklepów Home Improvement w Polsce. To my, prawie 13 000 pracowników, których łączy jedno przekonanie, że każdy zasługuje na dom, w którym może czuć się dobrze. Niezależnie od miejsca zamieszkania, tworzymy jeden zespół, który pomaga kli...

NAICS:452
NAICS Definition:N/A
Employees:1,613
Subsidiaries:10
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Ross Stores, Inc.

Ross Stores, Inc.

5130 Hacienda Drive, Dublin, CA, US, 94568

Last Update: 10/07/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
https://jobs.rossstores.com/
834/1000Good

For the last 40+ years, Ross Stores, Inc. has grown from a six-store chain into an $21.1 billion, Fortune 500 Company. We operate our off-price businesses in a way that keeps costs low so we can pass the savings to our customers. We continue to open new stores and our s...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:40,653
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Castorama Polska Sp. z o.o.

Castorama Polska Sp. z o.o.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Ross Stores, Inc.

Ross Stores, Inc.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Castorama Polska Sp. z o.o. in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ross Stores, Inc. in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Castorama Polska Sp. z o.o. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Castorama Polska Sp. z o.o. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Ross Stores, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ross Stores, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Castorama Polska Sp. z o.o.

Castorama Polska Sp. z o.o.

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Ross Stores, Inc.

Ross Stores, Inc.

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Castorama Polska Sp. z o.o. company and Ross Stores, Inc. company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Castorama Polska Sp. z o.o. company and Ross Stores, Inc. company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Castorama Polska Sp. z o.o. company and Ross Stores, Inc. company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Castorama Polska Sp. z o.o. company and Ross Stores, Inc. company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Castorama Polska Sp. z o.o. company and Ross Stores, Inc. company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Castorama Polska Sp. z o.o. company and Ross Stores, Inc. company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Castorama Polska Sp. z o.o. company and Ross Stores, Inc. company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Castorama Polska Sp. z o.o. company and Ross Stores, Inc. company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Castorama Polska Sp. z o.o. company and Ross Stores, Inc. company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Castorama Polska Sp. z o.o. company and Ross Stores, Inc. company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Castorama Polska Sp. z o.o. company and Ross Stores, Inc. company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Castorama Polska Sp. z o.o. and Ross Stores, Inc., which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Castorama Polska Sp. z o.o. and Ross Stores, Inc., which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Castorama Polska Sp. z o.o. or Ross Stores, Inc. ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Castorama Polska Sp. z o.o. or Ross Stores, Inc. ?
Between Castorama Polska Sp. z o.o. and Ross Stores, Inc., which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Castorama Polska Sp. z o.o. and Ross Stores, Inc., which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1