Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Cartera – A Rakuten CompanyCartera – A Rakuten Company
VS
foodpandafoodpanda
Cartera – A Rakuten Company

Cartera – A Rakuten Company

One Cranberry Hill, Suite 203, Lexington, MA, 02421, US

Last Update: 20/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.cartera.com
767/1000Fair

Cartera: A Rakuten Company We make shopping more rewarding. Cartera partners with major airlines and top banks who offer their customers loyalty programs. Since our launch in 2005, we’ve improved their customers’ experiences by helping them earn more of the miles, poin...

NAICS:513
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:108
Subsidiaries:14
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
foodpanda

foodpanda

63 Robinson Road, Singapore, 068894, SG

Last Update: 07/09/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://careers.foodpanda.com
805/1000Good

At foodpanda, we're on a mission to redefine how food, people, culture and tech are connected. Our panda family consists of problem solvers, designers and thinkers, working around the clock to make foodpanda the most powerful online tool for food convenience in the univ...

NAICS:513
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:17,790
Subsidiaries:4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Cartera – A Rakuten Company

Cartera – A Rakuten Company

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
foodpanda

foodpanda

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cartera – A Rakuten Company in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for foodpanda in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Cartera – A Rakuten Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cartera – A Rakuten Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - foodpanda (X = Date, Y = Severity)

foodpanda cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Cartera – A Rakuten Company

Cartera – A Rakuten Company

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
foodpanda

foodpanda

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Cartera – A Rakuten Company company and foodpanda company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Cartera – A Rakuten Company company and foodpanda company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Cartera – A Rakuten Company company and foodpanda company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Cartera – A Rakuten Company company and foodpanda company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Cartera – A Rakuten Company company and foodpanda company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Cartera – A Rakuten Company company and foodpanda company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Cartera – A Rakuten Company company and foodpanda company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Cartera – A Rakuten Company company and foodpanda company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Cartera – A Rakuten Company company and foodpanda company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Cartera – A Rakuten Company company and foodpanda company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Cartera – A Rakuten Company company and foodpanda company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Cartera – A Rakuten Company and foodpanda, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Cartera – A Rakuten Company and foodpanda, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Cartera – A Rakuten Company or foodpanda ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Cartera – A Rakuten Company or foodpanda ?
Between Cartera – A Rakuten Company and foodpanda, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Cartera – A Rakuten Company and foodpanda, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-16174
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified about a potential gap in Netskope Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) running on Windows systems. Successful exploitation of the gap could potentially allow a privileged user to send a crafted message to the EPDLP process port to trigger an integer overflow, leading to memory corruption. Successful exploitation would require the EPDLP module to be enabled in the client configuration, and that Memory Integrity is disabled. A successful exploit could potentially result in a denial-of-service, arbitrary code execution, or privilege escalation on the local machine.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-16172
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified of an out-of-bounds heap read affecting the Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) service of the Netskope Client. A local standard user could potentially send a specially crafted message that is not properly validated with a bounds check, likely crashing the kernel driver handler. Successful exploitation could potentially crash the EPDLP service, temporarily interrupting DLP enforcement. A successful exploit could potentially also reveal per-boot memory layout information to unauthorized users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-87958
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 is vulnerable to a denial of service where a specific functionality on a Db2 server can be disabled by a privileged user under certain conditions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-86093
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an attacker with the ability to control or impersonate a DRDA server endpoint to execute arbitrary commands on Db2 clients due to a stack-based buffer overflow that improperly copies user-controlled data into a fixed-size stack buffer without bounds checking.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-86087
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an authenticated user to send a specially crafted request to write arbitrary files on the system.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8