Comparison Overview

Carrier HVAC

VS

Thermax Limited

Carrier HVAC

Last Update: 2025-12-10
Between 750 and 799

Founded by the inventor of modern air conditioning, Carrier is a world leader in high-technology heating, air-conditioning and refrigeration solutions. Carrier experts provide sustainable solutions, integrating energy-efficient products, building controls and energy services for residential, commercial, retail, transport and food service customers. Carrier is part of Carrier Global Corporation, a leading global provider of innovative HVAC, refrigeration, and building automation technologies.

NAICS: 3332
NAICS Definition: Industrial Machinery Manufacturing
Employees: 11,168
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Thermax Limited

IN, IN
Last Update: 2025-12-10

Incorporated in 1966, Thermax Group is a 1 billion US$ company headquartered in Pune, India. Over the years, it has grown into a leading conglomerate in the energy and environment space and a trusted partner in energy transition. Strategically spreading its operations to 90+ countries while catering to a gamut of industries, the company offers integrated solutions in heating, cooling, power generation, water treatment and recycling, air pollution control, and chemicals with a focus on ensuring clean air, clean energy, and clean water. The solutions, products and services developed by Thermax help industries achieve better resource productivity and improve bottom line while maintaining a cleaner environment. Today, Thermax has a sales and service network spread over Asia, Southeast Asia, the Middle East, Africa, Europe and the Americas. It operates globally through 34 international and 22 domestic offices, and has 14 manufacturing facilities – 10 of which are in India and four overseas. The group consists of 17 domestic subsidiaries and 20 international subsidiaries.

NAICS: 3332
NAICS Definition: Industrial Machinery Manufacturing
Employees: 10,962
Subsidiaries: 7
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/carrierhvac.jpeg
Carrier HVAC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/thermaxlimited.jpeg
Thermax Limited
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Carrier HVAC
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Thermax Limited
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Industrial Machinery Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Carrier HVAC in 2025.

Incidents vs Industrial Machinery Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Thermax Limited in 2025.

Incident History — Carrier HVAC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Carrier HVAC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Thermax Limited (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Thermax Limited cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/carrierhvac.jpeg
Carrier HVAC
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/thermaxlimited.jpeg
Thermax Limited
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Carrier HVAC company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Thermax Limited company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Thermax Limited company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Carrier HVAC company.

In the current year, Thermax Limited company and Carrier HVAC company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Thermax Limited company nor Carrier HVAC company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Thermax Limited company nor Carrier HVAC company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Thermax Limited company nor Carrier HVAC company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Carrier HVAC company nor Thermax Limited company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Carrier HVAC nor Thermax Limited holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Thermax Limited company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Carrier HVAC company.

Carrier HVAC company employs more people globally than Thermax Limited company, reflecting its scale as a Industrial Machinery Manufacturing.

Neither Carrier HVAC nor Thermax Limited holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Carrier HVAC nor Thermax Limited holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Carrier HVAC nor Thermax Limited holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Carrier HVAC nor Thermax Limited holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Carrier HVAC nor Thermax Limited holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Carrier HVAC nor Thermax Limited holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N