Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Carrell Blanton Ferris & Associates, PLCCarrell Blanton Ferris & Associates, PLC
VS
DLA PiperDLA Piper
Carrell Blanton Ferris & Associates, PLC

Carrell Blanton Ferris & Associates, PLC

Forest Plaza II, Suite 310, 7275 Glen Forest Drive, Richmond, Virginia, US, 23226

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://carrellblanton.com/
719/1000Moderate

Carrell Blanton Ferris & Associates, PLC. provides legal services to clients in the Commonwealth of Virginia - with offices in Richmond, Williamsburg, Virginia Beach, and Fredericksburg. Our firm has experienced lawyers practicing in the areas of estate and trust planni...

NAICS:54111
NAICS Definition:Offices of Lawyers
Employees:35
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
DLA Piper

DLA Piper

160 Aldersgate Street, London, EC1A 4HT, GB

Last Update: 03/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.dlapiper.com
782/1000Fair

DLA Piper is a global law firm helping our clients achieve their goals wherever they do business. Our pursuit of innovation has transformed our delivery of legal services. With offices in the Americas, Europe, the Middle East, Africa and Asia Pacific, we deliver excepti...

NAICS:54111
NAICS Definition:Offices of Lawyers
Employees:13,333
Subsidiaries:15
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Carrell Blanton Ferris & Associates, PLC

Carrell Blanton Ferris & Associates, PLC

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
DLA Piper

DLA Piper

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Law Practice Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Carrell Blanton Ferris & Associates, PLC in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Law Practice Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for DLA Piper in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Carrell Blanton Ferris & Associates, PLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Carrell Blanton Ferris & Associates, PLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - DLA Piper (X = Date, Y = Severity)

DLA Piper cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Carrell Blanton Ferris & Associates, PLC

Carrell Blanton Ferris & Associates, PLC

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
CAR450080425
DLA Piper

DLA Piper

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Carrell Blanton Ferris & Associates, PLC company and DLA Piper company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Carrell Blanton Ferris & Associates, PLC company and DLA Piper company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Carrell Blanton Ferris & Associates, PLC company and DLA Piper company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Carrell Blanton Ferris & Associates, PLC company and DLA Piper company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Carrell Blanton Ferris & Associates, PLC company and DLA Piper company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Carrell Blanton Ferris & Associates, PLC company and DLA Piper company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Carrell Blanton Ferris & Associates, PLC company and DLA Piper company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Carrell Blanton Ferris & Associates, PLC company and DLA Piper company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Carrell Blanton Ferris & Associates, PLC company and DLA Piper company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Carrell Blanton Ferris & Associates, PLC company and DLA Piper company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Carrell Blanton Ferris & Associates, PLC company and DLA Piper company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Carrell Blanton Ferris & Associates, PLC and DLA Piper, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Carrell Blanton Ferris & Associates, PLC and DLA Piper, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Carrell Blanton Ferris & Associates, PLC or DLA Piper ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Carrell Blanton Ferris & Associates, PLC or DLA Piper ?
Between Carrell Blanton Ferris & Associates, PLC and DLA Piper, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Carrell Blanton Ferris & Associates, PLC and DLA Piper, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-57980
SUMMARY

Authentication bypass using an alternate path or channel in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform tampering over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-56741
SUMMARY

JLine is a Java library for handling console input. Prior to 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1, the JLine3 Telnet server remote-telnet module does not apply an upper bound to terminal dimensions received via the Telnet NAWS option, and TelnetIO.handleNAWS() in TelnetIO.java:856-879 reads client-supplied width and height as 16-bit unsigned integers and passes values such as 65535x65535 to setTerminalGeometry(), allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to repeatedly alternate values and trigger continuous expensive rendering work that causes CPU exhaustion and denial of service. This issue is fixed in versions 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56740
SUMMARY

JLine is a Java library for handling console input. Prior to 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1, the JLine3 Telnet server remote-telnet module does not limit the number of environment variables a client may inject via the Telnet NEW-ENVIRON option, and TelnetIO.readNEVariables() in TelnetIO.java:1127-1180 stores each variable pair in a HashMap held by ConnectionData, allowing an unauthenticated attacker to flood unique variable pairs before the terminating IAC SE byte and exhaust JVM heap memory with an OutOfMemoryError. This issue is fixed in versions 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56171
SUMMARY

Exposure of private personal information to an unauthorized actor in Windows RDP allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-54335
SUMMARY

Feathersjs is a framework for creating web APIs and real-time applications with TypeScript or JavaScript. In 5.0.44 and earlier, the _.merge(target, source) utility exported by @feathersjs/commons recursively merges source into target by iterating Object.keys(source). When source was produced by JSON.parse and contains a __proto__, constructor, or prototype key, that key is returned as an own-enumerable property; the recursive merge then resolves target['__proto__'] to Object.prototype and writes attacker-supplied properties onto it, polluting the prototype for all plain objects in the process for the lifetime of the Node process. This issue is fixed in version 5.0.45.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2