Comparison Overview
Carrefour China

Carrefour China
555 Langao Road, Shanghai, 20000, CN
Last Update: 11/03/2026
Carrefour Group, founded in 1959 and an inventor of the hypermarket concept, is one of major multinational retailers and Fortune 500 companies, operating nearly 10,000 retail stores in more than 30 countries and regions across the world. It’s engaged in multiple busines...

Best Buy
7601 Penn Ave South, Richfield, 55423-3645, US
Last Update: 04/04/2026
At Best Buy, our purpose is to enrich lives through technology. We do that by leveraging our unique combination of tech expertise and human touch to meet our customers’ everyday needs, whether they come to us online, visit our stores or invite us into their homes. With ...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Carrefour China







Best Buy






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Carrefour China in 2026.
Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)
Best Buy has 2.91% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - Carrefour China (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Carrefour China cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Best Buy (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Best Buy cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Carrefour China

Best Buy
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
A vulnerability has been found in SourceCodester Simple Online Food Ordering System 1.0. This affects an unknown function of the file /admin/ajax.php?action=login2. The manipulation of the argument email leads to sql injection. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.
A flaw was found in the ipa_getkeytab module of the community.general Ansible collection. The module's bind_pw parameter, used to supply the LDAP simple-bind password when retrieving a Kerberos keytab, is not declared with no_log, unlike the sibling password parameter in the same module. As a consequence, the supplied IPA/LDAP bind password is recorded in cleartext in the managed host's system journal/syslog (the module's "Invoked with" record), is included in the module's return values and verbose (-v) output, and is displayed in Automation Controller / AWX job output. The password is additionally passed on the command line to the ipa-getkeytab helper (as --bindpw <value>), exposing it in the process list to local users while the command runs. An attacker able to read these logs, job output, or the process table can obtain the directory bind credential, potentially compromising the accounts and objects that credential can access.
The device metadata import interface /device/instance/{productId}/property-metadata/import of jetlinks community 2.11 is vulnerable to Server-side request forgery (SSRF).
disconf (Distributed Configuration Management Platform) 2.6.36 is vulnerable to Incorrect Access Control. The config-fetching APIs /api/config/item, /api/config/file, /api/config/list and /api/config/simple/list are exposed without authentication. The LoginInterceptor explicitly whitelists these four paths, so any anonymous attacker can read every configuration item and configuration file managed by the config center.
Funiture 1.0.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in the backend tool interfaces /sys/tool/select.json and /sys/tool/update.json.