Comparison Overview

Carousell Group

VS

VMware

Carousell Group

Last Update: 2025-12-01

At Carousell, we believe in more than just buying and selling. We believe in the power of possibilities that people bring to the process. Through every buyer, seller and listing, we believe there’s opportunity beyond the transactional. Our mission is to inspire every person in the world to start selling and buying to make more possible for one another. Carousell was founded by Siu Rui, Lucas and Marcus back in August 2012 - whereby the focus is to give our users the tools to solve problems- whether it’s decluttering or earning side income- there are possibilities for everyone. We believe that technology is an enabler to solve meaningful problems at scale. We are crafting the most seamless user experience for people to sell what they don’t need and find what they need. Carousell Group is the leading multi-category platform for secondhand in Greater Southeast Asia on a mission to make secondhand the first choice. Founded in August 2012 in Singapore, the Group has a leading presence in seven markets under the brands Carousell, Carousell Media Group, Cho Tot, Laku6, LuxLexicon, Mudah.my, OneShift, REFASH and Revo Financial, serving tens of millions of monthly active users. Carousell is backed by leading investors including Telenor Group, Rakuten Ventures, Naver, STIC Investments, 500 Global and Peak XV Partners (formerly known as Sequoia Capital India). We have offices across Southeast Asia, India, Taiwan and Hong Kong. As a team of passionate individuals working together to solve meaningful problems, there is so much more for you to discover in a career with Carousell.

NAICS: 5112
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 1,158
Subsidiaries: 5
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2

VMware

3401 Hillview Ave, None, Palo Alto, CA, US, 94304
Last Update: 2025-12-01

VMware by Broadcom delivers software that unifies and streamlines hybrid cloud environments for the world’s most complex organizations. By combining public-cloud scale and agility with private-cloud security and performance, we empower our customers to modernize, optimize and protect their apps and businesses everywhere. Capable of deployment in the software-defined data center, cloud environments, any app and the enterprise edge, our comprehensive software portfolio makes global enterprises more innovative, connected, resilient and secure.

NAICS: 5112
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 13,658
Subsidiaries: 36
12-month incidents
5
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
4

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/carousellgroup.jpeg
Carousell Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/vmware.jpeg
VMware
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Carousell Group
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
VMware
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Carousell Group in 2025.

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

VMware has 1062.79% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History — Carousell Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Carousell Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — VMware (X = Date, Y = Severity)

VMware cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/carousellgroup.jpeg
Carousell Group
Incidents

Date Detected: 10/2022
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: System Migration Bug
Motivation: Financial Gain
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 6/2022
Type:Data Leak
Attack Vector: Phishing emails or messages
Motivation: Financial gain
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/vmware.jpeg
VMware
Incidents

Date Detected: 7/2025
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: Phishing, Spearphishing, Vishing, SIM Swap Attacks, Push Bombing
Motivation: Data theft for extortion, financial gain
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 6/2025
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Unauthenticated Remote Code Execution (RCE)
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 6/2025
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: Zero-Day Exploit (CVE-2025-61882, CVE-2025-21884), Unauthenticated HTTP Requests, Data Exfiltration
Motivation: Financial Gain (Ransomware Extortion)
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Carousell Group company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to VMware company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

VMware company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to Carousell Group company.

In the current year, VMware company has reported more cyber incidents than Carousell Group company.

VMware company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Carousell Group company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Both VMware company and Carousell Group company have disclosed experiencing at least one data breach.

VMware company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Carousell Group company has not reported such incidents publicly.

VMware company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while Carousell Group company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Carousell Group nor VMware holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

VMware company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Carousell Group company.

VMware company employs more people globally than Carousell Group company, reflecting its scale as a Software Development.

Neither Carousell Group nor VMware holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Carousell Group nor VMware holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Carousell Group nor VMware holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Carousell Group nor VMware holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Carousell Group nor VMware holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Carousell Group nor VMware holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

MCP Server Kubernetes is an MCP Server that can connect to a Kubernetes cluster and manage it. Prior to 2.9.8, there is a security issue exists in the exec_in_pod tool of the mcp-server-kubernetes MCP Server. The tool accepts user-provided commands in both array and string formats. When a string format is provided, it is passed directly to shell interpretation (sh -c) without input validation, allowing shell metacharacters to be interpreted. This vulnerability can be exploited through direct command injection or indirect prompt injection attacks, where AI agents may execute commands without explicit user intent. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.9.8.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

XML external entity (XXE) injection in eyoucms v1.7.1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via crafted body of a POST request.

Description

An issue was discovered in Fanvil x210 V2 2.12.20 allowing unauthenticated attackers on the local network to access administrative functions of the device (e.g. file upload, firmware update, reboot...) via a crafted authentication bypass.

Description

Cal.com is open-source scheduling software. Prior to 5.9.8, A flaw in the login credentials provider allows an attacker to bypass password verification when a TOTP code is provided, potentially gaining unauthorized access to user accounts. This issue exists due to problematic conditional logic in the authentication flow. This vulnerability is fixed in 5.9.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Rhino is an open-source implementation of JavaScript written entirely in Java. Prior to 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1, when an application passed an attacker controlled float poing number into the toFixed() function, it might lead to high CPU consumption and a potential Denial of Service. Small numbers go through this call stack: NativeNumber.numTo > DToA.JS_dtostr > DToA.JS_dtoa > DToA.pow5mult where pow5mult attempts to raise 5 to a ridiculous power. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X