Comparison Overview

Carousell Group

VS

Bolt

Carousell Group

Last Update: 2025-12-01

At Carousell, we believe in more than just buying and selling. We believe in the power of possibilities that people bring to the process. Through every buyer, seller and listing, we believe there’s opportunity beyond the transactional. Our mission is to inspire every person in the world to start selling and buying to make more possible for one another. Carousell was founded by Siu Rui, Lucas and Marcus back in August 2012 - whereby the focus is to give our users the tools to solve problems- whether it’s decluttering or earning side income- there are possibilities for everyone. We believe that technology is an enabler to solve meaningful problems at scale. We are crafting the most seamless user experience for people to sell what they don’t need and find what they need. Carousell Group is the leading multi-category platform for secondhand in Greater Southeast Asia on a mission to make secondhand the first choice. Founded in August 2012 in Singapore, the Group has a leading presence in seven markets under the brands Carousell, Carousell Media Group, Cho Tot, Laku6, LuxLexicon, Mudah.my, OneShift, REFASH and Revo Financial, serving tens of millions of monthly active users. Carousell is backed by leading investors including Telenor Group, Rakuten Ventures, Naver, STIC Investments, 500 Global and Peak XV Partners (formerly known as Sequoia Capital India). We have offices across Southeast Asia, India, Taiwan and Hong Kong. As a team of passionate individuals working together to solve meaningful problems, there is so much more for you to discover in a career with Carousell.

NAICS: 5112
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 1,158
Subsidiaries: 5
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2

Bolt

Tallinn, EE
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

At Bolt, we're building a future where people don’t need to own personal cars to move around safely and conveniently. A future where people have the freedom to use transport on demand, choosing whatever vehicle's best for each occasion — be it a car, scooter, or e-bike. We're helping over 200 million customers move around in more than 600 cities globally while also supporting more than 4.5 million drivers and couriers to earn a living. The best bit? We're only just getting started. Read more at bolt.eu

NAICS: 5112
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 13,687
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/carousellgroup.jpeg
Carousell Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bolt-eu.jpeg
Bolt
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Carousell Group
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Bolt
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Carousell Group in 2025.

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bolt in 2025.

Incident History — Carousell Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Carousell Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Bolt (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bolt cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/carousellgroup.jpeg
Carousell Group
Incidents

Date Detected: 10/2022
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: System Migration Bug
Motivation: Financial Gain
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 6/2022
Type:Data Leak
Attack Vector: Phishing emails or messages
Motivation: Financial gain
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bolt-eu.jpeg
Bolt
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Bolt company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Carousell Group company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Carousell Group company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Bolt company has not reported any.

In the current year, Bolt company and Carousell Group company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Bolt company nor Carousell Group company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Carousell Group company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Bolt company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Bolt company nor Carousell Group company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Carousell Group company nor Bolt company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Carousell Group nor Bolt holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Carousell Group company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Bolt company.

Bolt company employs more people globally than Carousell Group company, reflecting its scale as a Software Development.

Neither Carousell Group nor Bolt holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Carousell Group nor Bolt holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Carousell Group nor Bolt holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Carousell Group nor Bolt holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Carousell Group nor Bolt holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Carousell Group nor Bolt holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

MCP Server Kubernetes is an MCP Server that can connect to a Kubernetes cluster and manage it. Prior to 2.9.8, there is a security issue exists in the exec_in_pod tool of the mcp-server-kubernetes MCP Server. The tool accepts user-provided commands in both array and string formats. When a string format is provided, it is passed directly to shell interpretation (sh -c) without input validation, allowing shell metacharacters to be interpreted. This vulnerability can be exploited through direct command injection or indirect prompt injection attacks, where AI agents may execute commands without explicit user intent. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.9.8.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

XML external entity (XXE) injection in eyoucms v1.7.1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via crafted body of a POST request.

Description

An issue was discovered in Fanvil x210 V2 2.12.20 allowing unauthenticated attackers on the local network to access administrative functions of the device (e.g. file upload, firmware update, reboot...) via a crafted authentication bypass.

Description

Cal.com is open-source scheduling software. Prior to 5.9.8, A flaw in the login credentials provider allows an attacker to bypass password verification when a TOTP code is provided, potentially gaining unauthorized access to user accounts. This issue exists due to problematic conditional logic in the authentication flow. This vulnerability is fixed in 5.9.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Rhino is an open-source implementation of JavaScript written entirely in Java. Prior to 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1, when an application passed an attacker controlled float poing number into the toFixed() function, it might lead to high CPU consumption and a potential Denial of Service. Small numbers go through this call stack: NativeNumber.numTo > DToA.JS_dtostr > DToA.JS_dtoa > DToA.pow5mult where pow5mult attempts to raise 5 to a ridiculous power. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X