Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Carnival UK (P&O Cruises & Cunard)Carnival UK (P&O Cruises & Cunard)
VS
BCD TravelBCD Travel
Carnival UK (P&O Cruises & Cunard)

Carnival UK (P&O Cruises & Cunard)

Carnival House, Southampton, SO15 1ST, GB

Last Update: 22/03/2026

View Profile
776/1000Fair

Carnival UK is the operating company for P&O Cruises & Cunard. We provide world class cruise holidays and take enormous pride from bringing to life two of the most iconic brands from Britain’s rich seafaring heritage. That legacy of elegance and style, of beautiful ship...

NAICS:5615
NAICS Definition:Travel Arrangement and Reservation Services
Employees:5,321
Subsidiaries:7
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
BCD Travel

BCD Travel

Europalaan 300, Utrecht, NL, 3526 KS

Last Update: 07/10/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.bcdtravel.com
726/1000Moderate

BCD Travel helps companies travel smart and achieve more. We drive program adoption, cost savings and talent retention through digital experiences that simplify business travel. Our 15,000+ dedicated team members service clients in 170+ countries as we shape a sustainab...

NAICS:5615
NAICS Definition:Travel Arrangement and Reservation Services
Employees:16,649
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Carnival UK (P&O Cruises & Cunard)

Carnival UK (P&O Cruises & Cunard)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
BCD Travel

BCD Travel

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Travel Arrangements Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Carnival UK (P&O Cruises & Cunard) in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Travel Arrangements Industry Avg (This Year)

BCD Travel has 0.99% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Carnival UK (P&O Cruises & Cunard) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Carnival UK (P&O Cruises & Cunard) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - BCD Travel (X = Date, Y = Severity)

BCD Travel cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Carnival UK (P&O Cruises & Cunard)

Carnival UK (P&O Cruises & Cunard)

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
BCD Travel

BCD Travel

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
BCD1780576089
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
BCD528072625

FAQ

Between Carnival UK (P&O Cruises & Cunard) company and BCD Travel company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Carnival UK (P&O Cruises & Cunard) company and BCD Travel company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Carnival UK (P&O Cruises & Cunard) company and BCD Travel company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Carnival UK (P&O Cruises & Cunard) company and BCD Travel company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Carnival UK (P&O Cruises & Cunard) company and BCD Travel company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Carnival UK (P&O Cruises & Cunard) company and BCD Travel company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Carnival UK (P&O Cruises & Cunard) company and BCD Travel company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Carnival UK (P&O Cruises & Cunard) company and BCD Travel company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Carnival UK (P&O Cruises & Cunard) company and BCD Travel company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Carnival UK (P&O Cruises & Cunard) company and BCD Travel company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Carnival UK (P&O Cruises & Cunard) company and BCD Travel company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Carnival UK (P&O Cruises & Cunard) and BCD Travel, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Carnival UK (P&O Cruises & Cunard) and BCD Travel, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Carnival UK (P&O Cruises & Cunard) or BCD Travel ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Carnival UK (P&O Cruises & Cunard) or BCD Travel ?
Between Carnival UK (P&O Cruises & Cunard) and BCD Travel, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Carnival UK (P&O Cruises & Cunard) and BCD Travel, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-97626
SUMMARY

Requesting a user or organization profile page (`GET /{username}`) with an `Accept: application/rss+xml` or `Accept: application/atom+xml` header returned the owner's activity feed without the visibility check that the profile page and the `.rss` and `.atom` routes apply. Anonymous users, restricted users and non-members could confirm the existence of limited or private users and private organizations and read their profile details and public activity, also when `[other] ENABLE_FEED` was disabled. Activity in private repositories was not included.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97208
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint for creating push mirrors (`POST /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/push_mirrors`) checked only whether mirroring was enabled and not the `[mirror] DISABLE_NEW_PUSH` setting that the web interface enforces. A repository administrator could therefore create new push mirrors on instances where the site administrator had disabled them. A push mirror pushes all refs of the repository to a remote chosen by the caller, on each commit or on a schedule.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-96594
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint `GET /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/media/{filepath}` wrote files of up to 1 KiB that are stored directly in Git, not in LFS, to the response without the content type and disposition headers Gitea uses for user content. An HTML file committed to a repository was therefore rendered by the browser on the Gitea origin. A user who can push to a repository could run JavaScript in the session of a victim who opens the media URL and act with the victim's permissions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-89182
SUMMARY

With `[repository] FORCE_PRIVATE = true`, Gitea creates new repositories as private, but the post-receive hook still applied the `repo.private=false` push option to an empty repository created by push. Any user who can create repositories could make their new repository public in violation of the instance policy. The default configuration is not affected.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-86684
SUMMARY

The Gitea push mirror API checked whether the repository owner, instead of the requesting user, may use local file system paths. On instances with `[security] IMPORT_LOCAL_PATHS = true`, a repository administrator who is not allowed to import local paths could add a push mirror to a local path on the server when the repository owner has that permission. Gitea then pushed the repository's refs into an existing Git repository at that path with the permissions of the Gitea process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA