Comparison Overview
Carnival Support Services India Pvt. Ltd

Carnival Support Services India Pvt. Ltd
Carnival Support Services India. Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai, 400070, IN
Last Update: 02/04/2026
Carnival Support Services India Pvt. Ltd (CSSI) is India’s largest crewing company and a wholly owned subsidiary of Carnival Corporation and Plc – the world’s largest leisure travel company. CSSI provides highly skilled and trained personnel to 8 global cruise brands un...

The Adecco Group
Bellerivestrasse 30, Zurich, 8008, CH
Last Update: 07/09/2026
The Adecco Group is a world leading talent company. Our purpose is making the future work for everyone. Through our three global business units - Adecco, Akkodis and LHH - across 60 countries, we enable sustainable and lifelong employability for individuals, deliver dig...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Carnival Support Services India Pvt. Ltd







The Adecco Group






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Human Resources Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Carnival Support Services India Pvt. Ltd in 2026.
Incidents vs Human Resources Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for The Adecco Group in 2026.
Incident History - Carnival Support Services India Pvt. Ltd (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Carnival Support Services India Pvt. Ltd cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - The Adecco Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)
The Adecco Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Carnival Support Services India Pvt. Ltd

The Adecco Group
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
HTTP/2 servers could end up crashing due to inadvertently modifying its HPACK encoder concurrently. This happens because the server modifies the HPACK encoder from two goroutines without synchronization: one uses the encoder to encode a HEADERS frame as part of a response sent to a client and the other modifies the encoder's table size when handling a SETTINGS frame containing SETTINGS_HEADER_TABLE_SIZE that a client sends. A malicious client can repeatedly send a request while changing the header table size to crash the server.
Multiple ECH outer extension references are not permitted under RFC 9849; previously, a client could send a well-crafted packet that could trigger memory exhaustion in the server process by specifying multiple references. We now reject these as malformed and curb the memory amplification vector as a result.
A trusted template author may have previously written a valid template wherein the use of the 'yield' keyword would not be correctly escaped. We now ensure that valid keyword uses are escaped and non-keyword uses are not escaped.
Improper certificate validation in Microsoft Partner Center allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.
Authorization bypass through user-controlled key in Microsoft Bookings allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.