Comparison Overview

Carnival Corporation

VS

Royal Caribbean Group

Carnival Corporation

3655 NW 87th Avenue, Miami, FL, US, 33178
Last Update: 2025-11-24
Between 550 and 599

Carnival Corporation & plc (NYSE: CCL; NYSE: CUK) is the largest global cruise company, and among the largest leisure travel companies, with a portfolio of world-class cruise lines and a fleet of over 90 ships. Together its cruise lines – including AIDA Cruises, Carnival Cruise Line, Costa Cruises, Cunard, Holland America Line, P&O Cruises, Princess Cruises, and Seabourn – visit more than 800 ports around the world and account for nearly 40% of the overall cruise market globally. In 2024, the company’s talented workforce of over 160,000 team members from 150 countries delivered unforgettable happiness to approximately 13.5 million guests by providing extraordinary cruise vacations, while honoring the integrity of every ocean sailed, place visited, and life touched. Carnival Corporation owns and operates eight destinations globally, designed exclusively for guests of the company’s cruise lines, as well as Holland America Princess Alaska Tours, the leading tour company in Alaska and the Canadian Yukon. The company is dual-listed and traded on the London and New York stock exchanges and is included in both the S&P 500 index in the US and the FTSE 250 index in the UK.

NAICS: 5615
NAICS Definition: Travel Arrangement and Reservation Services
Employees: 2,980
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
4
Attack type number
2

Royal Caribbean Group

Royal Caribbean Group 1050 Caribbean Way Miami, None, Miami, Florida, US, 2312
Last Update: 2025-11-22

At Royal Caribbean Group, we deliver unforgettable vacations to guests who trust us with life’s greatest moments. We build the best ships, and even better careers, all while doing the right thing. We are passionate. We are innovative. We are unstoppable. We open the world to our employees. Your journey is our journey — chart your own course. Journey with us! Our culture: What sets the Group apart is the multicultural environment we create with employees from over 126 countries. We cultivate a workplace where employees feel they can be themselves, are appreciated because of their differences and are empowered to become part of the fabric of the Group. We have been repeatedly recognized by the Ethisphere Institute as one of the World’s Most Ethical Companies. For us, it’s a simple three-word phrase: Make good choices. Our employees have a commitment to compliance, doing the right thing and integrity.  Our brands: Royal Caribbean Group (NYSE: RCL) is a cruise vacation company comprised of three award-winning global brands: Royal Caribbean International, Celebrity Cruises, and Silversea Cruises. Royal Caribbean Group is also a 50% owner of a joint venture that operates TUI Cruises and Hapag-Lloyd Cruises. Together, our brands operate a global fleet traveling to more than 800 destinations worldwide. Our promise: We deliver the best vacation experiences, responsibly. Every one of our values and actions flows from this promise. To operate the safest ships on the seas. To protect the oceans we sail. To put people and communities first in everything we do. Find out more here - https://www.royalcaribbeangroup.com/bluegreenpromise/ Link to the careers page: https://careers.royalcaribbeangroup.com/

NAICS: 5615
NAICS Definition: Travel Arrangement and Reservation Services
Employees: 42,399
Subsidiaries: 4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/carnival-corporation.jpeg
Carnival Corporation
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/royal-caribbean-group.jpeg
Royal Caribbean Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Carnival Corporation
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Royal Caribbean Group
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Travel Arrangements Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Carnival Corporation in 2025.

Incidents vs Travel Arrangements Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Royal Caribbean Group in 2025.

Incident History — Carnival Corporation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Carnival Corporation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Royal Caribbean Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Royal Caribbean Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/carnival-corporation.jpeg
Carnival Corporation
Incidents

Date Detected: 3/2021
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Email Account Compromise
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 3/2021
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: email (phishing or credential compromise)
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 8/2020
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized third-party access
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/royal-caribbean-group.jpeg
Royal Caribbean Group
Incidents

Date Detected: 8/2021
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 2/2021
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access (Email Account Compromise)
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Royal Caribbean Group company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Carnival Corporation company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Carnival Corporation company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to Royal Caribbean Group company.

In the current year, Royal Caribbean Group company and Carnival Corporation company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Carnival Corporation company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Royal Caribbean Group company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Both Royal Caribbean Group company and Carnival Corporation company have disclosed experiencing at least one data breach.

Neither Royal Caribbean Group company nor Carnival Corporation company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Carnival Corporation company nor Royal Caribbean Group company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Carnival Corporation nor Royal Caribbean Group holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Royal Caribbean Group company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Carnival Corporation company.

Royal Caribbean Group company employs more people globally than Carnival Corporation company, reflecting its scale as a Travel Arrangements.

Neither Carnival Corporation nor Royal Caribbean Group holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Carnival Corporation nor Royal Caribbean Group holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Carnival Corporation nor Royal Caribbean Group holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Carnival Corporation nor Royal Caribbean Group holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Carnival Corporation nor Royal Caribbean Group holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Carnival Corporation nor Royal Caribbean Group holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H