Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Carmel Clay SchoolsCarmel Clay Schools
VS
Cobb County School DistrictCobb County School District
Carmel Clay Schools

Carmel Clay Schools

5201 E MAIN ST, Carmel, 46033, US

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.ccs.k12.in.us
710/1000Moderate

Carmel Clay Schools is a nationally recognized public school district that serves approximately 16,500 students and 2,400 staff across 15 school sites in Carmel, Indiana. The academic achievements of our students make us a top performing district in the state of India...

NAICS:6111
NAICS Definition:Elementary and Secondary Schools
Employees:1,232
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1
Cobb County School District

Cobb County School District

514 Glover Street, Marietta, 30060, US

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.cobbk12.org
785/1000Fair

The COBB COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT is a public school system with administrative offices based at 514 Glover St., Marietta, GA 30060. Cobb County School District (CCSD) is the second largest school system in Georgia. CCSD is responsible for educating more than 112,000 stud...

NAICS:6111
NAICS Definition:Elementary and Secondary Schools
Employees:10,237
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Carmel Clay Schools

Carmel Clay Schools

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Cobb County School District

Cobb County School District

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Primary and Secondary Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Carmel Clay Schools in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Primary and Secondary Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cobb County School District in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Carmel Clay Schools (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Carmel Clay Schools cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Cobb County School District (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cobb County School District cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Carmel Clay Schools

Carmel Clay Schools

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
CAR23526123
🔒 Incident : Breach
CAR430080425
Cobb County School District

Cobb County School District

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Carmel Clay Schools company and Cobb County School District company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Carmel Clay Schools company and Cobb County School District company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Carmel Clay Schools company and Cobb County School District company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Carmel Clay Schools company and Cobb County School District company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Carmel Clay Schools company and Cobb County School District company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Carmel Clay Schools company and Cobb County School District company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Carmel Clay Schools company and Cobb County School District company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Carmel Clay Schools company and Cobb County School District company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Carmel Clay Schools company and Cobb County School District company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Carmel Clay Schools company and Cobb County School District company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Carmel Clay Schools company and Cobb County School District company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Carmel Clay Schools and Cobb County School District, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Carmel Clay Schools and Cobb County School District, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Carmel Clay Schools or Cobb County School District ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Carmel Clay Schools or Cobb County School District ?
Between Carmel Clay Schools and Cobb County School District, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Carmel Clay Schools and Cobb County School District, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-49416
SUMMARY

The CONS_HISTORY ioctl handler did not adequately validate the requested history size. A large value caused an integer overflow in the buffer size calculation, resulting in a heap allocation smaller than expected. Subsequent initialization of the buffer wrote beyond the end of the allocation. An unprivileged local user with access to a vt(4) device can trigger an out-of-bounds write in the kernel, potentially escalating privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49414
SUMMARY

The ELF image activator cleared per-process ASLR preference flags for setuid binaries after the code that computes the PIE base address, rather than before. As a result, a user-requested ASLR disable was still in effect at the point where the base address was chosen. An unprivileged local user can disable ASLR for a setuid PIE binary by calling procctl(2) before execve(2). This makes exploitation of any separate memory corruption vulnerability in that binary significantly easier.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49417
SUMMARY

Second, the audio buffer backing a mapping could be freed when the device was closed even though the mapping remained valid. The freed memory could then be reused elsewhere while still accessible through the stale mapping. The /dev/dsp device nodes are world-accessible by default. On a system with an audio device, either issue allows an unprivileged local user to read and write kernel memory, which can be used to escalate privileges, potentially gaining full control of the affected system. At a minimum, an attacker can crash the kernel, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49413
SUMMARY

The Linuxulator determined whether a binary was set-user-ID or set-group-ID by checking the P_SUGID process flag. During execve(2), this flag is not yet set at the point where the auxiliary vector is constructed, so AT_SECURE was incorrectly set to zero for set-user-ID and set-group-ID executables. An unprivileged local user can inject a shared library via LD_PRELOAD into a set-user-ID or set-group-ID Linux binary, gaining the privileges of that binary.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49412
SUMMARY

The kernel handler for IPV6_MSFILTER dropped a serializing lock in order to copy the source-filter list from userspace, then reacquired the lock. During this window another thread could free the multicast filter structure, leaving the handler with a stale pointer to freed memory. An unprivileged local user can exploit this use-after-free to escalate privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA