Comparison Overview

CarMax

VS

PUMA Group

CarMax

12800 Tuckahoe Creek Parkway, Richmond, Virginia, US, 23238
Last Update: 2026-01-24
Between 750 and 799

We're fueled by a common goal: creating an iconic car-buying experience. We make car-buying fair, accessible, and joyful for all. We are committed to making progress in how we positively impact our society, now and in the future. Above all, we care about people. We are committed to putting people first, including our associates, customers, and communities. Spark positive change alongside us. Here’s your chance to leave a mark. Find the purpose, tools, and resources to go for greatness with teammates by your side. We offer benefits and resources to help make your best life happen. Professional growth and limitless opportunities await. There's no better place to be.

NAICS: 43
NAICS Definition: Retail Trade
Employees: 17,417
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

PUMA Group

PUMA Way 1, Herzogenaurach, DE, 91074
Last Update: 2026-01-20

PUMA is one of the world’s leading sports brands, designing, developing, selling and marketing footwear, apparel and accessories. For more than 75 years, PUMA has relentlessly pushed sport and culture forward by creating fast products for the world’s fastest athletes. PUMA offers performance and sport-inspired lifestyle products in categories such as Football, Running and Training, Basketball, Golf, and Motorsports. It collaborates with renowned designers and brands to bring sport influences into street culture and fashion. The PUMA Group owns the brands PUMA, Cobra Golf and stichd. The company operates in more than 120 countries, employs around 22,000 people worldwide, and is headquartered in Herzogenaurach/Germany.

NAICS: 43
NAICS Definition: Retail Trade
Employees: 21,972
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/carmax.jpeg
CarMax
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/puma.jpeg
PUMA Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
CarMax
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
PUMA Group
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CarMax in 2026.

Incidents vs Retail Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for PUMA Group in 2026.

Incident History — CarMax (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CarMax cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — PUMA Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

PUMA Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/carmax.jpeg
CarMax
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/puma.jpeg
PUMA Group
Incidents

Date Detected: 01/2023
Type:Data Leak
Motivation: Financial Gain
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 02/2022
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

FAQ

CarMax company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to PUMA Group company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

PUMA Group company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas CarMax company has not reported any.

In the current year, PUMA Group company and CarMax company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither PUMA Group company nor CarMax company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

PUMA Group company has disclosed at least one data breach, while CarMax company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither PUMA Group company nor CarMax company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither CarMax company nor PUMA Group company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither CarMax nor PUMA Group holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither CarMax company nor PUMA Group company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

PUMA Group company employs more people globally than CarMax company, reflecting its scale as a Retail.

Neither CarMax nor PUMA Group holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither CarMax nor PUMA Group holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither CarMax nor PUMA Group holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither CarMax nor PUMA Group holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither CarMax nor PUMA Group holds HIPAA certification.

Neither CarMax nor PUMA Group holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.

Description

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.

Description

A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.