Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Carefleet S.A. | Grupa Crédit AgricoleCarefleet S.A. | Grupa Crédit Agricole
VS
MichelinMichelin
Carefleet S.A. | Grupa Crédit Agricole

Carefleet S.A. | Grupa Crédit Agricole

ul. Legnicka 48 bud. C-D, Wrocław, dolnosląskie, 54-202, PL

Last Update: 15/02/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.carefleet.pl
746/1000Moderate

Carefleet S.A. jest jedną z wiodących na polskim rynku firm specjalizujących się w finansowaniu i obsłudze flot dla dużych przedsiębiorstw, instytucji publicznych oraz podmiotów z sektora MŚP. Naszym flagowym produktem jest wynajem długoterminowy – rozwiązanie, które za...

NAICS:3361
NAICS Definition:Motor Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees:74
Subsidiaries:32
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Michelin

Michelin

Place des Carmes Déchaux, Clermont-Ferrand, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes, FR

Last Update: 04/04/2026

View Profile
Between 550 and 599
http://www.michelin.com
577/1000Very Poor

Michelin is a world-leading manufacturer of life-changing composites and experiences. Pioneering materials science over more than 130 years, Michelin is uniquely positioned to make decisive contributions to human progress and a more sustainable world. Drawing on techno...

NAICS:3361
NAICS Definition:Motor Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees:52,207
Subsidiaries:18
12-month incidents
2
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Carefleet S.A. | Grupa Crédit Agricole

Carefleet S.A. | Grupa Crédit Agricole

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Michelin

Michelin

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Carefleet S.A. | Grupa Crédit Agricole in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

Michelin has 92.31% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Carefleet S.A. | Grupa Crédit Agricole (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Carefleet S.A. | Grupa Crédit Agricole cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Michelin (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Michelin cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Carefleet S.A. | Grupa Crédit Agricole

Carefleet S.A. | Grupa Crédit Agricole

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Michelin

Michelin

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
NO-SHOPRELOB1773534483
🔒 Incident : Breach
MADMICKORORA1773232260
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
BRO3105131112625

FAQ

Between Carefleet S.A. | Grupa Crédit Agricole company and Michelin company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Carefleet S.A. | Grupa Crédit Agricole company and Michelin company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Carefleet S.A. | Grupa Crédit Agricole company and Michelin company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Carefleet S.A. | Grupa Crédit Agricole company and Michelin company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Carefleet S.A. | Grupa Crédit Agricole company and Michelin company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Carefleet S.A. | Grupa Crédit Agricole company and Michelin company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Carefleet S.A. | Grupa Crédit Agricole company and Michelin company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Carefleet S.A. | Grupa Crédit Agricole company and Michelin company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Carefleet S.A. | Grupa Crédit Agricole company and Michelin company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Carefleet S.A. | Grupa Crédit Agricole company and Michelin company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Carefleet S.A. | Grupa Crédit Agricole company and Michelin company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Carefleet S.A. | Grupa Crédit Agricole and Michelin, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Carefleet S.A. | Grupa Crédit Agricole and Michelin, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Carefleet S.A. | Grupa Crédit Agricole or Michelin ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Carefleet S.A. | Grupa Crédit Agricole or Michelin ?
Between Carefleet S.A. | Grupa Crédit Agricole and Michelin, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Carefleet S.A. | Grupa Crédit Agricole and Michelin, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1