Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Care.com HomePayCare.com HomePay
VS
KPMGKPMG
Care.com HomePay

Care.com HomePay

undefined, Austin , TX, undefined, US

Last Update: 24/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.care.com/homepay
752/1000Fair

When families hire a nanny, senior caregiver, housekeeper, personal assistant or other household employee to work in or around their home, they have specific federal, state and local payroll & tax rules to follow throughout the year. The IRS, state tax agencies, and co...

NAICS:5412
NAICS Definition:Accounting, Tax Preparation, Bookkeeping, and Payroll Services
Employees:116
Subsidiaries:26
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
KPMG

KPMG

Worldwide, CA

Last Update: 05/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.kpmg.com
832/1000Good

KPMG is a global organization of independent professional services firms providing Audit, Tax and Advisory services. KPMG is the brand under which the member firms of KPMG International Limited (“KPMG International”) operate and provide professional services. “KPMG” is ...

NAICS:5412
NAICS Definition:Accounting, Tax Preparation, Bookkeeping, and Payroll Services
Employees:238,915
Subsidiaries:71
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Care.com HomePay

Care.com HomePay

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
KPMG

KPMG

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Accounting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Care.com HomePay in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Accounting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for KPMG in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Care.com HomePay (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Care.com HomePay cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - KPMG (X = Date, Y = Severity)

KPMG cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Care.com HomePay

Care.com HomePay

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
KPMG

KPMG

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Care.com HomePay company and KPMG company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Care.com HomePay company and KPMG company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Care.com HomePay company and KPMG company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Care.com HomePay company and KPMG company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Care.com HomePay company and KPMG company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Care.com HomePay company and KPMG company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Care.com HomePay company and KPMG company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Care.com HomePay company and KPMG company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Care.com HomePay company and KPMG company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Care.com HomePay company and KPMG company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Care.com HomePay company and KPMG company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Care.com HomePay and KPMG, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Care.com HomePay and KPMG, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Care.com HomePay or KPMG ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Care.com HomePay or KPMG ?
Between Care.com HomePay and KPMG, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Care.com HomePay and KPMG, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-67866
SUMMARY

Buffer Overflow vulnerability in Systerel S2OPC 1.7.3 allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service via the LockedStaMac_ProcessMsg_DeleteMonitoredItemsResponse and SOPC_StaMac_NewDeleteMonitoredItems in the client wrapper DeleteMonitoredItems path

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-67863
SUMMARY

In open62541 1.5.5, a server-side use-after-free exists in the local MonitoredItem callback path. The issue occurs when UA_Subscription_localPublish continues to use the current UA_Notification after a callback invokes UA_Server_deleteMonitoredItem for the current local MonitoredItem. This allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-19026
SUMMARY

H5Z__filter_nbit in H5Znbit.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 dereferences cd_values[0] through cd_values[4] without validating that cd_values is non-NULL or that cd_nelmts is at least 5, the fixed size of the filter's header. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service via a crafted HDF5 file that stores the N-Bit filter pipeline message with zero client-data values, opened and read via H5Dread, e.g. by the h5ls or h5repack tools.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-19025
SUMMARY

H5O__layout_decode in H5Olayout.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 does not validate that a chunked dataset's stored chunk-layout dimensionality matches its dataspace rank when an existing dataset is opened, whereas this check is performed only at dataset-creation time. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service (divide-by-zero and application crash in H5S__hyper_iter_get_seq_list in src/H5Shyper.c) via a crafted HDF5 file with mismatched chunk/dataspace ranks that is opened and read via H5Dopen2 and H5Dread, e.g. by the h5repack tool.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA