Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Cardinal Points Imaging of the CarolinasCardinal Points Imaging of the Carolinas
VS
Highmark HealthHighmark Health
Cardinal Points Imaging of the Carolinas

Cardinal Points Imaging of the Carolinas

1212 Cedarhurst Dr, Raleigh, North Carolina, 27609, US

Last Update: 04/04/2026

View Profile
761/1000Fair

Cardinal Points Imaging is a full-service imaging center, dedicated to providing consistent, quality, state of the art outpatient imaging services, with a deep commitment to customer service and patient care. With four locations in Raleigh, Wake Forest and Clayton our p...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:51
Subsidiaries:16
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Highmark Health

Highmark Health

120 5th Ave, Pittsburgh, US

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
711/1000Moderate

A national blended health organization, Highmark Health and our leading businesses support millions of customers with products, services and solutions closely aligned to our mission of creating remarkable health experiences, freeing people to be their best. Headquarter...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:15,521
Subsidiaries:13
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
3

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Cardinal Points Imaging of the Carolinas

Cardinal Points Imaging of the Carolinas

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Highmark Health

Highmark Health

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cardinal Points Imaging of the Carolinas in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Highmark Health in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Cardinal Points Imaging of the Carolinas (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cardinal Points Imaging of the Carolinas cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Highmark Health (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Highmark Health cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Cardinal Points Imaging of the Carolinas

Cardinal Points Imaging of the Carolinas

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Highmark Health

Highmark Health

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Data Leak
HIG53025623
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
HIG305072725
🔒 Incident : Breach
HIG13581522

FAQ

Between Cardinal Points Imaging of the Carolinas company and Highmark Health company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Cardinal Points Imaging of the Carolinas company and Highmark Health company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Cardinal Points Imaging of the Carolinas company and Highmark Health company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Cardinal Points Imaging of the Carolinas company and Highmark Health company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Cardinal Points Imaging of the Carolinas company and Highmark Health company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Cardinal Points Imaging of the Carolinas company and Highmark Health company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Cardinal Points Imaging of the Carolinas company and Highmark Health company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Cardinal Points Imaging of the Carolinas company and Highmark Health company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Cardinal Points Imaging of the Carolinas company and Highmark Health company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Cardinal Points Imaging of the Carolinas company and Highmark Health company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Cardinal Points Imaging of the Carolinas company and Highmark Health company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Cardinal Points Imaging of the Carolinas and Highmark Health, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Cardinal Points Imaging of the Carolinas and Highmark Health, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Cardinal Points Imaging of the Carolinas or Highmark Health ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Cardinal Points Imaging of the Carolinas or Highmark Health ?
Between Cardinal Points Imaging of the Carolinas and Highmark Health, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Cardinal Points Imaging of the Carolinas and Highmark Health, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66720
SUMMARY

The GOOSE subscriber component improperly validates the UTC timestamp field in unauthenticated IEC 61850 GOOSE (EtherType 0x88B8) Layer-2 multicast messages. A specially crafted GOOSE frame containing an undersized timestamp field can trigger a heap out-of-bounds read during message processing, causing the process to crash and resulting in a denial-of-service condition.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-30
UPDATED
Date2026-07-30
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-66421
SUMMARY

OpenClaw Dashboard contains a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability that allows unauthenticated remote attackers to execute arbitrary JavaScript in the administrator's browser session by injecting HTML markup into agent transcript messages processed through the sessions API. Attackers can craft a message containing inline event handler payloads such as an img tag with an onerror attribute within the 60-character rendering budget, which is stored in the session transcript and interpolated unsanitized into innerHTML on the default landing page, allowing theft of session tokens and unauthorized calls to authenticated administrative endpoints including agent instruction file modification.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-30
UPDATED
Date2026-07-30
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:H/SI:H/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-66420
SUMMARY

MeshCentral 1.1.21 contains a cross-site WebSocket hijacking protection bypass vulnerability that allows unauthenticated remote attackers to hijack authenticated administrator sessions by exploiting an unconditional early return in the CheckWebServerOriginName() function within webserver.js when self-signed certificates are in use. Attackers can open cross-origin WebSocket connections to any of the twelve WebSocket endpoints, send crafted action commands to exfiltrate the server sessionKey used to sign session cookies, forge session tokens as arbitrary users, and gain full remote control of all managed devices governed by the MeshCentral instance.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-30
UPDATED
Date2026-07-30
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-66369
SUMMARY

The GOOSE parser contains an off-by-one boundary-handling flaw that can be triggered by a single unauthenticated Layer-2 multicast frame on the process bus. When specific GOOSE message fields are processed, the parser advances its internal buffer position incorrectly, resulting in a heap out-of-bounds read. On affected platforms, this condition reliably terminates the subscriber process and causes a denial-of-service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-30
UPDATED
Date2026-07-30
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-66364
SUMMARY

The GOOSE payload parser contains a boundary handling flaw that can be triggered by a single unauthenticated Layer 2 multicast frame on the process bus. When processing specific payload fields, an attacker controlled inner element length may exceed its enclosing length, causing the parser to over read by one byte. This out-of-bounds read reliably terminates the subscriber process, resulting in a denial-of-service condition.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-30
UPDATED
Date2026-07-30
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8