Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Cardinal Points Imaging of the CarolinasCardinal Points Imaging of the Carolinas
VS
GenesisGenesis
Cardinal Points Imaging of the Carolinas

Cardinal Points Imaging of the Carolinas

1212 Cedarhurst Dr, Raleigh, North Carolina, 27609, US

Last Update: 04/04/2026

View Profile
761/1000Fair

Cardinal Points Imaging is a full-service imaging center, dedicated to providing consistent, quality, state of the art outpatient imaging services, with a deep commitment to customer service and patient care. With four locations in Raleigh, Wake Forest and Clayton our p...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:51
Subsidiaries:16
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Genesis

Genesis

101 East State Street, Kennett Square, PA, US, 19348

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.genesishcc.com
781/1000Fair

As a premier care provider since 1985, Genesis HealthCare is a holding company with subsidiaries that, on a combined basis, provide services to skilled nursing facilities and senior living communities. Genesis also specializes in contract rehabilitation therapy, respira...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:14,448
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Cardinal Points Imaging of the Carolinas

Cardinal Points Imaging of the Carolinas

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Genesis

Genesis

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cardinal Points Imaging of the Carolinas in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Genesis in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Cardinal Points Imaging of the Carolinas (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cardinal Points Imaging of the Carolinas cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Genesis (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Genesis cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Cardinal Points Imaging of the Carolinas

Cardinal Points Imaging of the Carolinas

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Genesis

Genesis

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Cardinal Points Imaging of the Carolinas company and Genesis company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Cardinal Points Imaging of the Carolinas company and Genesis company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Cardinal Points Imaging of the Carolinas company and Genesis company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Cardinal Points Imaging of the Carolinas company and Genesis company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Cardinal Points Imaging of the Carolinas company and Genesis company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Cardinal Points Imaging of the Carolinas company and Genesis company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Cardinal Points Imaging of the Carolinas company and Genesis company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Cardinal Points Imaging of the Carolinas company and Genesis company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Cardinal Points Imaging of the Carolinas company and Genesis company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Cardinal Points Imaging of the Carolinas company and Genesis company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Cardinal Points Imaging of the Carolinas company and Genesis company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Cardinal Points Imaging of the Carolinas and Genesis, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Cardinal Points Imaging of the Carolinas and Genesis, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Cardinal Points Imaging of the Carolinas or Genesis ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Cardinal Points Imaging of the Carolinas or Genesis ?
Between Cardinal Points Imaging of the Carolinas and Genesis, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Cardinal Points Imaging of the Carolinas and Genesis, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-67866
SUMMARY

Buffer Overflow vulnerability in Systerel S2OPC 1.7.3 allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service via the LockedStaMac_ProcessMsg_DeleteMonitoredItemsResponse and SOPC_StaMac_NewDeleteMonitoredItems in the client wrapper DeleteMonitoredItems path

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-67863
SUMMARY

In open62541 1.5.5, a server-side use-after-free exists in the local MonitoredItem callback path. The issue occurs when UA_Subscription_localPublish continues to use the current UA_Notification after a callback invokes UA_Server_deleteMonitoredItem for the current local MonitoredItem. This allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-19026
SUMMARY

H5Z__filter_nbit in H5Znbit.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 dereferences cd_values[0] through cd_values[4] without validating that cd_values is non-NULL or that cd_nelmts is at least 5, the fixed size of the filter's header. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service via a crafted HDF5 file that stores the N-Bit filter pipeline message with zero client-data values, opened and read via H5Dread, e.g. by the h5ls or h5repack tools.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-19025
SUMMARY

H5O__layout_decode in H5Olayout.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 does not validate that a chunked dataset's stored chunk-layout dimensionality matches its dataspace rank when an existing dataset is opened, whereas this check is performed only at dataset-creation time. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service (divide-by-zero and application crash in H5S__hyper_iter_get_seq_list in src/H5Shyper.c) via a crafted HDF5 file with mismatched chunk/dataspace ranks that is opened and read via H5Dopen2 and H5Dread, e.g. by the h5repack tool.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA