Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Carat from FiservCarat from Fiserv
VS
HDB Financial Services Ltd.HDB Financial Services Ltd.
Carat from Fiserv

Carat from Fiserv

255 Fiserv Drive, Brookfield, 53045, US

Last Update: 28/03/2026

View Profile

Carat from Fiserv is the global operating system for our enterprise clients – it is the set of services, connections and applications businesses need to thrive. Carat helps our clients create unified customer experiences – connected across devices, channels and geograph...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
HDB Financial Services Ltd.

HDB Financial Services Ltd.

HDB House, Tukaram Sandam Marg, Mumbai, 400057, IN

Last Update: 05/09/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
https://www.hdbfs.com
801/1000Good

HDB Financial Services (HDBFS) is a leading Non-Banking Financial Company (NBFC) that caters to the growing needs of an Aspirational India, serving both Individual & Business Clients The lines of business include - Lending and BPO Services. Incorporated in 2007, HDB is ...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:59,916
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Carat from Fiserv

Carat from Fiserv

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
HDB Financial Services Ltd.

HDB Financial Services Ltd.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Carat from Fiserv in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for HDB Financial Services Ltd. in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Carat from Fiserv (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Carat from Fiserv cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - HDB Financial Services Ltd. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

HDB Financial Services Ltd. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Carat from Fiserv

Carat from Fiserv

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
HDB Financial Services Ltd.

HDB Financial Services Ltd.

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Carat from Fiserv company and HDB Financial Services Ltd. company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Carat from Fiserv company and HDB Financial Services Ltd. company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Carat from Fiserv company and HDB Financial Services Ltd. company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Carat from Fiserv company and HDB Financial Services Ltd. company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Carat from Fiserv company and HDB Financial Services Ltd. company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Carat from Fiserv company and HDB Financial Services Ltd. company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Carat from Fiserv company and HDB Financial Services Ltd. company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Carat from Fiserv company and HDB Financial Services Ltd. company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Carat from Fiserv company and HDB Financial Services Ltd. company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Carat from Fiserv company and HDB Financial Services Ltd. company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Carat from Fiserv company and HDB Financial Services Ltd. company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Carat from Fiserv and HDB Financial Services Ltd., which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Carat from Fiserv and HDB Financial Services Ltd., which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Carat from Fiserv or HDB Financial Services Ltd. ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Carat from Fiserv or HDB Financial Services Ltd. ?
Between Carat from Fiserv and HDB Financial Services Ltd., which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Carat from Fiserv and HDB Financial Services Ltd., which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-16174
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified about a potential gap in Netskope Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) running on Windows systems. Successful exploitation of the gap could potentially allow a privileged user to send a crafted message to the EPDLP process port to trigger an integer overflow, leading to memory corruption. Successful exploitation would require the EPDLP module to be enabled in the client configuration, and that Memory Integrity is disabled. A successful exploit could potentially result in a denial-of-service, arbitrary code execution, or privilege escalation on the local machine.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-16172
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified of an out-of-bounds heap read affecting the Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) service of the Netskope Client. A local standard user could potentially send a specially crafted message that is not properly validated with a bounds check, likely crashing the kernel driver handler. Successful exploitation could potentially crash the EPDLP service, temporarily interrupting DLP enforcement. A successful exploit could potentially also reveal per-boot memory layout information to unauthorized users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-87958
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 is vulnerable to a denial of service where a specific functionality on a Db2 server can be disabled by a privileged user under certain conditions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-86093
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an attacker with the ability to control or impersonate a DRDA server endpoint to execute arbitrary commands on Db2 clients due to a stack-based buffer overflow that improperly copies user-controlled data into a fixed-size stack buffer without bounds checking.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-86087
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an authenticated user to send a specially crafted request to write arbitrary files on the system.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8