Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Caputo & Associates CPASCaputo & Associates CPAS
VS
KPMGKPMG
Caputo & Associates CPAS

Caputo & Associates CPAS

538 Westchester Avenue, Rye Brook, 10573, US

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://cacpas.org/
701/1000Moderate

We are dedicated to provide timely, responsive, professional and quality services to our clients for reasonable fees. We take a very personal approach to serving our clients. Because we get new business from the people who know us best, client referrals have fueled our ...

NAICS:5412
NAICS Definition:Accounting, Tax Preparation, Bookkeeping, and Payroll Services
Employees:6
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
KPMG

KPMG

Worldwide, CA

Last Update: 05/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.kpmg.com
832/1000Good

KPMG is a global organization of independent professional services firms providing Audit, Tax and Advisory services. KPMG is the brand under which the member firms of KPMG International Limited (“KPMG International”) operate and provide professional services. “KPMG” is ...

NAICS:5412
NAICS Definition:Accounting, Tax Preparation, Bookkeeping, and Payroll Services
Employees:238,915
Subsidiaries:71
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Caputo & Associates CPAS

Caputo & Associates CPAS

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
KPMG

KPMG

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Accounting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Caputo & Associates CPAS in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Accounting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for KPMG in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Caputo & Associates CPAS (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Caputo & Associates CPAS cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - KPMG (X = Date, Y = Severity)

KPMG cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Caputo & Associates CPAS

Caputo & Associates CPAS

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
CAP201072725
KPMG

KPMG

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Caputo & Associates CPAS company and KPMG company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Caputo & Associates CPAS company and KPMG company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Caputo & Associates CPAS company and KPMG company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Caputo & Associates CPAS company and KPMG company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Caputo & Associates CPAS company and KPMG company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Caputo & Associates CPAS company and KPMG company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Caputo & Associates CPAS company and KPMG company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Caputo & Associates CPAS company and KPMG company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Caputo & Associates CPAS company and KPMG company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Caputo & Associates CPAS company and KPMG company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Caputo & Associates CPAS company and KPMG company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Caputo & Associates CPAS and KPMG, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Caputo & Associates CPAS and KPMG, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Caputo & Associates CPAS or KPMG ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Caputo & Associates CPAS or KPMG ?
Between Caputo & Associates CPAS and KPMG, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Caputo & Associates CPAS and KPMG, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-71194
SUMMARY

In OpenStack Designate before 22.0.2, the mDNS handler performs pool-blind lookups when resolving record queries and NOTIFY requests. When two zones with the same name exist across different pools, the lookup fails with a deterministic error, causing the handler to return REFUSED for all DNS queries through that path. The _handle_notify path is exploitable via a single unauthenticated UDP packet. This is independently reachable through the cross-tenant zone overlap described in a different recent CVE, and also affects legitimate same-tenant cross-pool configurations. BIND9 views do not mitigate this issue as mDNS is a shared service upstream of any view configuration.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-12
UPDATED
Date2026-08-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-71193
SUMMARY

In OpenStack Designate before 22.0.1, zone creation checks (_is_subzone, _is_superzone, and the duplicate-zone DB constraint) are scoped to the target pool only. An authenticated user can bypass these checks by scheduling a zone to a different pool via the AttributeFilter scheduler, creating an overlapping zone that conflicts with another tenant's zone. This enables cross-tenant DNS hijack (redirecting traffic to attacker-controlled IPs) and DNS denial of service (NODATA responses). Exploitation requires a multi-pool deployment with AttributeFilter enabled in scheduler_filters, which is a non-default but documented and supported configuration for self-service tiering.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-12
UPDATED
Date2026-08-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.1
CVE-2026-49481
SUMMARY

UpSnap is a wake on lan web app. Versions prior to 5.4.0 have an OS command injection vulnerability in the UpSnap’s device management functionality due to the presence of unsafe shell command template interpolation using the ip and the mac fields. User-controlled values can be inserted into the wake_cmd and shutdown_cmd templates and executed via /bin/sh -c (Linux) or cmd /C (Windows) without sanitization, resulting in an authenticated Remote Code Execution (RCE). A low-privileged user with permission to create or edit devices can execute arbitrary operating system commands on the UpSnap hosted server. Version 5.4.0 patches the issue.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-12
UPDATED
Date2026-08-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.1
CVE-2026-47718
SUMMARY

FUXA is a web-based Process Visualization (SCADA/HMI/Dashboard) software. When `secureEnabled=true`, FUXA `1.3.0-2773` still allows guest and invalid-token requests to read project, alarms, and scheduler APIs. Version 1.3.1 fixes this issue.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-12
UPDATED
Date2026-08-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-47717
SUMMARY

FUXA is a web-based Process Visualization (SCADA/HMI/Dashboard) software. In fuxa-server version 1.3.0, the GET /api/project endpoint exposes sensitive project configuration data to guest-context requests even when secureEnabled is enabled. Version 1.3.1 fixes the issue.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-12
UPDATED
Date2026-08-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9