Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

CaptureRxCaptureRx
VS
RHÖN-KLINIKUM AGRHÖN-KLINIKUM AG
CaptureRx

CaptureRx

219 East Houston Street, San Antonio, 78205, US

Last Update: 29/03/2026

View Profile
Between 650 and 699
http://www.capturerx.com
697/1000Weak

Founded in 2000, San Antonio-based CaptureRx is a healthcare technology company and leading 340B solution provider that puts people first, touching millions of patient lives through customer obsession and innovative products and services that support relationships among...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:109
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2
RHÖN-KLINIKUM AG

RHÖN-KLINIKUM AG

1 Schlossplatz, Bad Neustadt an der Saale, DE, 97616

Last Update: 11/05/2026

View Profile
764/1000Fair

Die RHÖN‐KLINIKUM AG ist einer der größten Gesundheitsdienstleister in Deutschland. Die Kliniken bieten exzellente Medizin mit direkter Anbindung zu Universitäten und Forschungseinrichtungen. An den fünf Standorten Campus Bad Neustadt, Klinikum Frankfurt (Oder), Univers...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:335
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
CaptureRx

CaptureRx

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
RHÖN-KLINIKUM AG

RHÖN-KLINIKUM AG

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CaptureRx in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for RHÖN-KLINIKUM AG in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - CaptureRx (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CaptureRx cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - RHÖN-KLINIKUM AG (X = Date, Y = Severity)

RHÖN-KLINIKUM AG cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
CaptureRx

CaptureRx

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
CAP13123322
🔒 Incident : Breach
CAP506072525
RHÖN-KLINIKUM AG

RHÖN-KLINIKUM AG

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between CaptureRx company and RHÖN-KLINIKUM AG company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between CaptureRx company and RHÖN-KLINIKUM AG company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between CaptureRx company and RHÖN-KLINIKUM AG company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between CaptureRx company and RHÖN-KLINIKUM AG company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between CaptureRx company and RHÖN-KLINIKUM AG company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between CaptureRx company and RHÖN-KLINIKUM AG company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between CaptureRx company and RHÖN-KLINIKUM AG company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between CaptureRx company and RHÖN-KLINIKUM AG company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between CaptureRx company and RHÖN-KLINIKUM AG company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between CaptureRx company and RHÖN-KLINIKUM AG company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between CaptureRx company and RHÖN-KLINIKUM AG company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between CaptureRx and RHÖN-KLINIKUM AG, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between CaptureRx and RHÖN-KLINIKUM AG, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - CaptureRx or RHÖN-KLINIKUM AG ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - CaptureRx or RHÖN-KLINIKUM AG ?
Between CaptureRx and RHÖN-KLINIKUM AG, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between CaptureRx and RHÖN-KLINIKUM AG, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-57995
SUMMARY

phpMyFAQ before 4.1.5 contains a privilege escalation vulnerability in GroupController::updatePermissions that allows GROUP_EDIT administrators to grant arbitrary rights to groups without verifying they hold those rights themselves. A delegated administrator can exploit this by assigning high-value permissions to a group they belong to, inheriting those rights and escalating privileges up to full administrative control.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-30
UPDATED
Date2026-06-30
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-56777
SUMMARY

n8n before 2.25.7 and 2.26.x before 2.26.2 contains an abstract syntax tree (AST) security validator bypass in the Python Code node. An authenticated user with permission to create or modify workflows containing a Python Code node can bypass the validator and access the task executor module namespace. The issue only affects self-hosted instances where the Python Task Runner is enabled; where N8N_BLOCK_RUNNER_ENV_ACCESS is configured to allow it, this can disclose environment variables accessible to the task runner process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-30
UPDATED
Date2026-06-30
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.1
CVE-2026-56700
SUMMARY

Grav CMS before 2.0.0-beta.2 contains multiple code-execution vulnerabilities. Three unsafe unserialize() calls - in Scheduler\JobQueue, Framework\Cache\Adapter\FileCache, and Session - deserialize untrusted data without restricting allowed classes, enabling PHP object injection and, via a gadget chain, arbitrary code execution where an attacker controls the serialized input. Additionally, InstallCommand's git clone operation passes the branch, url, and path parameters into a shell command without escaping, allowing OS command injection via plugin/theme installation (which requires admin access). A Twig security blocklist bypass (server-side template injection) is also present. The issues are fixed in 2.0.0-beta.2.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-30
UPDATED
Date2026-06-30
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56415
SUMMARY

Storage Concentrator (SC & SCVM) contains a command injection vulnerability within the debug.pl script that is reachable without authentication. A remote attacker can submit a specially crafted HTTP request containing a malicious payload that is processed without adequate input sanitization, resulting in arbitrary command execution with root-level privileges on the underlying system.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-30
UPDATED
Date2026-06-30
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:L/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56413
SUMMARY

Storage Concentrator (SC & SCVM) contains a command injection vulnerability in the ms_service.pl service, which listens on TCP port 9000 by default and accepts custom network packets to perform device actions. An unauthenticated remote attacker can send a specially crafted packet containing a malicious payload that is processed without adequate sanitization, resulting in arbitrary command execution with root-level privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-30
UPDATED
Date2026-06-30
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:L/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9