Comparison Overview
Capita Europe

Capita Europe
Kommandantenstraße 22, Berlin, 10969, DE
Last Update: 21/02/2026
Capita is one of the leading European outsourcing service providers and, in addition to classic customer management, it also offers omni-channel solutions and models for digital transformation. At our locations in Germany, Switzerland and Poland, we carry out sustainabl...

Startek
Denver, 80237, US
Last Update: 31/03/2026
A global customer experience (CX) management solutions provider, Startek® delivers best-in-class omnichannel CX, digital transformation and enterprise tech services for leading brands, from Fortune 500s to fast-growing startups. Our innovation and expertise ensure CX ex...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Capita Europe







Startek






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Outsourcing and Offshoring Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Capita Europe in 2026.
Incidents vs Outsourcing and Offshoring Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Startek in 2026.
Incident History - Capita Europe (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Capita Europe cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Startek (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Startek cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Capita Europe

Startek
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Improper access control in Microsoft Edge for Android allows an unauthorized attacker to bypass a security feature over a network.
A security vulnerability has been detected in NousResearch hermes-agent up to 2026.4.30. Affected is the function GatewayStreamConsumer._filter_and_accumulate of the file gateway/stream_consumer.py of the component Streaming Reasoning Tag Filter. The manipulation leads to improper handling of case sensitivity. The attack may be initiated remotely. The attack's complexity is rated as high. The exploitability is told to be difficult. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used. The project decided to not implement a dedicated fix: "[T]he analysis and the fix are both sound. It just lands below the bar for the maintenance cost of a duplicated scrub path."
- https://gist.github.com/YLChen-007/2229e5505bcbb3e15a7ae8fba4c4be37
- https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/
- https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/issues/27288
- https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/28631#issuecomment-4622188016
- https://vuldb.com/cve/CVE-2026-14617
- https://vuldb.com/submit/844654
- https://vuldb.com/vuln/376134
- https://vuldb.com/vuln/376134/cti
Insufficient ui warning of dangerous operations in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network.
Improper neutralization of input during web page generation ('cross-site scripting') in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network.
Relative path traversal in Microsoft Edge for Android allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information locally.