Comparison Overview
Capgemini Engineering

Capgemini Engineering
76, Avenue Kléber, Paris, 75116, FR
Last Update: 01/04/2026
Capgemini Engineering is the engineering and R&D services powerhouse of the Capgemini Group, combining its broad industry knowledge and cutting-edge technologies in digital and software to support the convergence of the physical and digital worlds. Coupled with the capa...

Tata Technologies
25 Rajiv Gandhi Infotech Park, Hinjawadi, Pune, 411057, IN
Last Update: 01/04/2026
We're a global product engineering and digital services company focused on fulfilling our mission of helping the world drive, fly, build, and farm by enabling our customers to realize better products and deliver better experiences. We’re the strategic engineering partne...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Capgemini Engineering







Tata Technologies






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Engineering Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Capgemini Engineering in 2026.
Incidents vs Engineering Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Tata Technologies in 2026.
Incident History - Capgemini Engineering (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Capgemini Engineering cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Tata Technologies (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Tata Technologies cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Capgemini Engineering

Tata Technologies
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Netskope was notified about a potential gap in Netskope Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) running on Windows systems. Successful exploitation of the gap could potentially allow a privileged user to send a crafted message to the EPDLP process port to trigger an integer overflow, leading to memory corruption. Successful exploitation would require the EPDLP module to be enabled in the client configuration, and that Memory Integrity is disabled. A successful exploit could potentially result in a denial-of-service, arbitrary code execution, or privilege escalation on the local machine.
Netskope was notified of an out-of-bounds heap read affecting the Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) service of the Netskope Client. A local standard user could potentially send a specially crafted message that is not properly validated with a bounds check, likely crashing the kernel driver handler. Successful exploitation could potentially crash the EPDLP service, temporarily interrupting DLP enforcement. A successful exploit could potentially also reveal per-boot memory layout information to unauthorized users.
IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 is vulnerable to a denial of service where a specific functionality on a Db2 server can be disabled by a privileged user under certain conditions.
IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an attacker with the ability to control or impersonate a DRDA server endpoint to execute arbitrary commands on Db2 clients due to a stack-based buffer overflow that improperly copies user-controlled data into a fixed-size stack buffer without bounds checking.
IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an authenticated user to send a specially crafted request to write arbitrary files on the system.