Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

The Cape Cod Five Cents Savings BankThe Cape Cod Five Cents Savings Bank
VS
Garanti BBVAGaranti BBVA
The Cape Cod Five Cents Savings Bank

The Cape Cod Five Cents Savings Bank

1500 Iyannough Rd, Hyannis, 02601, US

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 600 and 649
http://www.capecodfive.com
624/1000Poor

Cape Cod 5 is a community bank with over $5.7 billion in assets committed to supporting its customers wherever they are – in the world and on their life journey – through its full-service digital offerings or in person at one of its locations throughout Cape Cod, Nantuc...

NAICS:52211
NAICS Definition:Commercial Banking
Employees:509
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
Garanti BBVA

Garanti BBVA

Nisbetiye Mh., Aytar Caddesi No:2 Zincirlikuyu, Istanbul, Istanbul, TR

Last Update: 31/03/2026

View Profile
788/1000Fair

With a digitalization and people oriented vision, we contribute to our economy and society. We make great efforts to help you make the best financial decisions by offering you the opportunities of the future with our dynamic business model, pioneering technology and inn...

NAICS:52211
NAICS Definition:Commercial Banking
Employees:17,024
Subsidiaries:23
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
The Cape Cod Five Cents Savings Bank

The Cape Cod Five Cents Savings Bank

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Garanti BBVA

Garanti BBVA

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Banking Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Cape Cod Five Cents Savings Bank in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Banking Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Garanti BBVA in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - The Cape Cod Five Cents Savings Bank (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Cape Cod Five Cents Savings Bank cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Garanti BBVA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Garanti BBVA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
The Cape Cod Five Cents Savings Bank

The Cape Cod Five Cents Savings Bank

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
CAP1764796594
Garanti BBVA

Garanti BBVA

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between The Cape Cod Five Cents Savings Bank company and Garanti BBVA company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between The Cape Cod Five Cents Savings Bank company and Garanti BBVA company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between The Cape Cod Five Cents Savings Bank company and Garanti BBVA company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between The Cape Cod Five Cents Savings Bank company and Garanti BBVA company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between The Cape Cod Five Cents Savings Bank company and Garanti BBVA company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between The Cape Cod Five Cents Savings Bank company and Garanti BBVA company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between The Cape Cod Five Cents Savings Bank company and Garanti BBVA company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between The Cape Cod Five Cents Savings Bank company and Garanti BBVA company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between The Cape Cod Five Cents Savings Bank company and Garanti BBVA company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between The Cape Cod Five Cents Savings Bank company and Garanti BBVA company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between The Cape Cod Five Cents Savings Bank company and Garanti BBVA company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between The Cape Cod Five Cents Savings Bank and Garanti BBVA, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between The Cape Cod Five Cents Savings Bank and Garanti BBVA, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - The Cape Cod Five Cents Savings Bank or Garanti BBVA ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - The Cape Cod Five Cents Savings Bank or Garanti BBVA ?
Between The Cape Cod Five Cents Savings Bank and Garanti BBVA, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between The Cape Cod Five Cents Savings Bank and Garanti BBVA, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2