Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Canvys – Visual Technology SolutionsCanvys – Visual Technology Solutions
VS
Quanta Computer Inc. 廣達電腦Quanta Computer Inc. 廣達電腦
Canvys – Visual Technology Solutions

Canvys – Visual Technology Solutions

40W267 Keslinger Road, LaFox, IL, 60147, US

Last Update: 06/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.canvys.com
754/1000Fair

Canvys – Visual Technology Solutions is a Division of Richardson Electronics, Ltd. (NASDAQ: RELL). We are a global value-added integrator and manufacturer that specializes in creating custom monitor and All-In-One (Panel PC) solutions for Original Equipment Manufacturer...

NAICS:3341
NAICS Definition:Computer and Peripheral Equipment Manufacturing
Employees:61
Subsidiaries:4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Quanta Computer Inc. 廣達電腦

Quanta Computer Inc. 廣達電腦

TW

Last Update: 26/09/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.quantatw.com
744/1000Moderate

Established in 1988, Quanta Computer is the largest notebook computer ODM company in the world. With leading technology and strong R&D capability, Quanta has become a leader in hi-tech markets and the best partner providing quality design and manufacturing services to t...

NAICS:3341
NAICS Definition:Computer and Peripheral Equipment Manufacturing
Employees:11,080
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Canvys – Visual Technology Solutions

Canvys – Visual Technology Solutions

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Quanta Computer Inc. 廣達電腦

Quanta Computer Inc. 廣達電腦

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Computer Hardware Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Canvys – Visual Technology Solutions in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Computer Hardware Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Quanta Computer Inc. 廣達電腦 in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Canvys – Visual Technology Solutions (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Canvys – Visual Technology Solutions cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Quanta Computer Inc. 廣達電腦 (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Quanta Computer Inc. 廣達電腦 cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Canvys – Visual Technology Solutions

Canvys – Visual Technology Solutions

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Quanta Computer Inc. 廣達電腦

Quanta Computer Inc. 廣達電腦

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
QUA15716222

FAQ

Between Canvys – Visual Technology Solutions company and Quanta Computer Inc. 廣達電腦 company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Canvys – Visual Technology Solutions company and Quanta Computer Inc. 廣達電腦 company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Canvys – Visual Technology Solutions company and Quanta Computer Inc. 廣達電腦 company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Canvys – Visual Technology Solutions company and Quanta Computer Inc. 廣達電腦 company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Canvys – Visual Technology Solutions company and Quanta Computer Inc. 廣達電腦 company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Canvys – Visual Technology Solutions company and Quanta Computer Inc. 廣達電腦 company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Canvys – Visual Technology Solutions company and Quanta Computer Inc. 廣達電腦 company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Canvys – Visual Technology Solutions company and Quanta Computer Inc. 廣達電腦 company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Canvys – Visual Technology Solutions company and Quanta Computer Inc. 廣達電腦 company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Canvys – Visual Technology Solutions company and Quanta Computer Inc. 廣達電腦 company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Canvys – Visual Technology Solutions company and Quanta Computer Inc. 廣達電腦 company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Canvys – Visual Technology Solutions and Quanta Computer Inc. 廣達電腦, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Canvys – Visual Technology Solutions and Quanta Computer Inc. 廣達電腦, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Canvys – Visual Technology Solutions or Quanta Computer Inc. 廣達電腦 ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Canvys – Visual Technology Solutions or Quanta Computer Inc. 廣達電腦 ?
Between Canvys – Visual Technology Solutions and Quanta Computer Inc. 廣達電腦, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Canvys – Visual Technology Solutions and Quanta Computer Inc. 廣達電腦, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-89096
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in nfs-utils. An unauthenticated remote attacker can trigger a Denial of Service (DoS) by sending repeated state notification requests to an exposed rpc.statd service. The service fails to properly release memory allocated during callback processing, leading to continuous memory growth. Sustained requests can exhaust system resources, eventually causing the service to degrade or crash.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-89088
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in parted. A heap-based buffer overflow exists in libparted's file system resizing logic when handling FAT16 volumes. By convincing a user or administrator to resize a specially crafted FAT16 file system image with malformed directory metadata, an attacker can trigger an oversized read into a fixed-size memory buffer. This issue causes memory corruption, resulting in an application crash and a denial of service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-89085
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in parted. A heap-based buffer overflow can occur when processing a specially crafted FAT32 filesystem due to an integer calculation error during buffer allocation. A local attacker could exploit this by enticing a user or automated service to open a malicious filesystem image, resulting in an application crash leading to a Denial of Service (DoS) or potential memory corruption.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-17591
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in libarchive. An attacker can cause a Denial of Service (DoS) or potential information disclosure due to a use-after-free vulnerability, which occurs when a program reads memory that has already been released. This issue arises when the archive_entry_copy_mac_metadata() function deallocates an internal buffer before completing a data copy. An attacker who can supply input to an application utilizing this function can trigger the flaw to crash the application or read uninitialized memory data.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.6
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1
CVE-2026-111802
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Nautilus. When a removable drive or disk image is unmounted or ejected, Nautilus prompts the user to empty the trash without verifying whether the trash directory paths are symbolic links. An attacker can exploit this flaw by tricking a user into mounting a crafted storage volume and confirming the prompt to empty the trash, leading to the arbitrary deletion of files accessible to that user.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
1.3