Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Canon Information Technology Services, Inc.Canon Information Technology Services, Inc.
VS
IndiaMART InterMESH LimitedIndiaMART InterMESH Limited
Canon Information Technology Services, Inc.

Canon Information Technology Services, Inc.

850 Greenbrier Circle, None, Chesapeake, Virginia, US, 23320

Last Update: 11/01/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.cits.canon.com
767/1000Fair

We are the team behind Canon's customer service, helping earn our customer’s trust for decades. Canon Information Technology Services is at the forefront empowering our customers to realize their full creative potential. We are committed to innovation, excellence, and...

NAICS:513
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:75
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
IndiaMART InterMESH Limited

IndiaMART InterMESH Limited

IndiaMART InterMESH Ltd., 6th floor, Tower 2, Assotech Business Cresterra, Noida, 201305, IN

Last Update: 22/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.indiamart.com/
770/1000Fair

IndiaMART is India's largest online B2B marketplace, connecting buyers with suppliers across a wide array of industries. IndiaMART provides a platform for Small & Medium Enterprises (SMEs), large enterprises, and individual buyers, helping them access diverse portfolios...

NAICS:513
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:18,682
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Canon Information Technology Services, Inc.

Canon Information Technology Services, Inc.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
IndiaMART InterMESH Limited

IndiaMART InterMESH Limited

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Canon Information Technology Services, Inc. in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for IndiaMART InterMESH Limited in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Canon Information Technology Services, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Canon Information Technology Services, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - IndiaMART InterMESH Limited (X = Date, Y = Severity)

IndiaMART InterMESH Limited cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Canon Information Technology Services, Inc.

Canon Information Technology Services, Inc.

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
IndiaMART InterMESH Limited

IndiaMART InterMESH Limited

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Canon Information Technology Services, Inc. company and IndiaMART InterMESH Limited company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Canon Information Technology Services, Inc. company and IndiaMART InterMESH Limited company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Canon Information Technology Services, Inc. company and IndiaMART InterMESH Limited company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Canon Information Technology Services, Inc. company and IndiaMART InterMESH Limited company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Canon Information Technology Services, Inc. company and IndiaMART InterMESH Limited company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Canon Information Technology Services, Inc. company and IndiaMART InterMESH Limited company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Canon Information Technology Services, Inc. company and IndiaMART InterMESH Limited company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Canon Information Technology Services, Inc. company and IndiaMART InterMESH Limited company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Canon Information Technology Services, Inc. company and IndiaMART InterMESH Limited company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Canon Information Technology Services, Inc. company and IndiaMART InterMESH Limited company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Canon Information Technology Services, Inc. company and IndiaMART InterMESH Limited company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Canon Information Technology Services, Inc. and IndiaMART InterMESH Limited, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Canon Information Technology Services, Inc. and IndiaMART InterMESH Limited, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Canon Information Technology Services, Inc. or IndiaMART InterMESH Limited ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Canon Information Technology Services, Inc. or IndiaMART InterMESH Limited ?
Between Canon Information Technology Services, Inc. and IndiaMART InterMESH Limited, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Canon Information Technology Services, Inc. and IndiaMART InterMESH Limited, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-97626
SUMMARY

Requesting a user or organization profile page (`GET /{username}`) with an `Accept: application/rss+xml` or `Accept: application/atom+xml` header returned the owner's activity feed without the visibility check that the profile page and the `.rss` and `.atom` routes apply. Anonymous users, restricted users and non-members could confirm the existence of limited or private users and private organizations and read their profile details and public activity, also when `[other] ENABLE_FEED` was disabled. Activity in private repositories was not included.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97208
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint for creating push mirrors (`POST /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/push_mirrors`) checked only whether mirroring was enabled and not the `[mirror] DISABLE_NEW_PUSH` setting that the web interface enforces. A repository administrator could therefore create new push mirrors on instances where the site administrator had disabled them. A push mirror pushes all refs of the repository to a remote chosen by the caller, on each commit or on a schedule.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-96594
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint `GET /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/media/{filepath}` wrote files of up to 1 KiB that are stored directly in Git, not in LFS, to the response without the content type and disposition headers Gitea uses for user content. An HTML file committed to a repository was therefore rendered by the browser on the Gitea origin. A user who can push to a repository could run JavaScript in the session of a victim who opens the media URL and act with the victim's permissions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-89182
SUMMARY

With `[repository] FORCE_PRIVATE = true`, Gitea creates new repositories as private, but the post-receive hook still applied the `repo.private=false` push option to an empty repository created by push. Any user who can create repositories could make their new repository public in violation of the instance policy. The default configuration is not affected.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-86684
SUMMARY

The Gitea push mirror API checked whether the repository owner, instead of the requesting user, may use local file system paths. On instances with `[security] IMPORT_LOCAL_PATHS = true`, a repository administrator who is not allowed to import local paths could add a push mirror to a local path on the server when the repository owner has that permission. Gitea then pushed the repository's refs into an existing Git repository at that path with the permissions of the Gitea process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA