Comparison Overview
Canon Information Technology Services, Inc.

Canon Information Technology Services, Inc.
850 Greenbrier Circle, None, Chesapeake, Virginia, US, 23320
Last Update: 11/01/2026
We are the team behind Canon's customer service, helping earn our customer’s trust for decades. Canon Information Technology Services is at the forefront empowering our customers to realize their full creative potential. We are committed to innovation, excellence, and...

Booking Holdings (NASDAQ: BKNG)
800 Connecticut Avenue, Norwalk, 06854, US
Last Update: 07/10/2026
Booking Holdings (NASDAQ: BKNG) is the world leader in online travel and services that support the entire travel journey. Our platforms - including Booking.com, Priceline, Agoda, KAYAK and OpenTable - utilize advanced AI, machine learning and other innovative technologi...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Canon Information Technology Services, Inc.







Booking Holdings (NASDAQ: BKNG)






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Canon Information Technology Services, Inc. in 2026.
Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Avg (This Year)
Booking Holdings (NASDAQ: BKNG) has 98.02% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - Canon Information Technology Services, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Canon Information Technology Services, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Booking Holdings (NASDAQ: BKNG) (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Booking Holdings (NASDAQ: BKNG) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Canon Information Technology Services, Inc.

Booking Holdings (NASDAQ: BKNG)
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
HTTP/2 servers could end up crashing due to inadvertently modifying its HPACK encoder concurrently. This happens because the server modifies the HPACK encoder from two goroutines without synchronization: one uses the encoder to encode a HEADERS frame as part of a response sent to a client and the other modifies the encoder's table size when handling a SETTINGS frame containing SETTINGS_HEADER_TABLE_SIZE that a client sends. A malicious client can repeatedly send a request while changing the header table size to crash the server.
Multiple ECH outer extension references are not permitted under RFC 9849; previously, a client could send a well-crafted packet that could trigger memory exhaustion in the server process by specifying multiple references. We now reject these as malformed and curb the memory amplification vector as a result.
A trusted template author may have previously written a valid template wherein the use of the 'yield' keyword would not be correctly escaped. We now ensure that valid keyword uses are escaped and non-keyword uses are not escaped.
Improper certificate validation in Microsoft Partner Center allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.
Authorization bypass through user-controlled key in Microsoft Bookings allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.