Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Canon Inc.Canon Inc.
VS
GraingerGrainger
Canon Inc.

Canon Inc.

Shimomaruko 3-chome, Ohta-ku, 146-8501, JP

Last Update: 14/05/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://global.canon/
762/1000Fair

Canon Inc., headquartered in Tokyo, Japan, is a leader in the fields of professional and consumer imaging equipment, industrial equipment and information systems. Canon’s extensive range of products includes production printers, multifunction office systems, inkjet and ...

NAICS:45321
NAICS Definition:Office Supplies and Stationery Stores
Employees:6,476
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
Grainger

Grainger

100 Grainger Parkway, Lake Forest, 60045, US

Last Update: 03/04/2026

View Profile

As a leading business-to-business organization, more than 4.5 million customers worldwide rely on Grainger for products in categories such as safety, material handling and metalworking, along with services like inventory management and technical support. For our Team ...

NAICS:45321
NAICS Definition:Office Supplies and Stationery Stores
Employees:21,351
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
3
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Canon Inc.

Canon Inc.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Grainger

Grainger

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Office Equipment Industry Avg (This Year)

Canon Inc. has 40.12% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Retail Office Equipment Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Grainger in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Canon Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Canon Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Grainger (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Grainger cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Canon Inc.

Canon Inc.

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
CAN1778783265
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
CAN354080725
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
CAN946040125
Grainger

Grainger

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
W.W1021090725
🔒 Incident : Breach
W.W552072825
🔒 Incident : Breach
W.W733072525

FAQ

Between Canon Inc. company and Grainger company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Canon Inc. company and Grainger company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Canon Inc. company and Grainger company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Canon Inc. company and Grainger company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Canon Inc. company and Grainger company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Canon Inc. company and Grainger company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Canon Inc. company and Grainger company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Canon Inc. company and Grainger company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Canon Inc. company and Grainger company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Canon Inc. company and Grainger company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Canon Inc. company and Grainger company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Canon Inc. and Grainger, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Canon Inc. and Grainger, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Canon Inc. or Grainger ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Canon Inc. or Grainger ?
Between Canon Inc. and Grainger, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Canon Inc. and Grainger, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-97626
SUMMARY

Requesting a user or organization profile page (`GET /{username}`) with an `Accept: application/rss+xml` or `Accept: application/atom+xml` header returned the owner's activity feed without the visibility check that the profile page and the `.rss` and `.atom` routes apply. Anonymous users, restricted users and non-members could confirm the existence of limited or private users and private organizations and read their profile details and public activity, also when `[other] ENABLE_FEED` was disabled. Activity in private repositories was not included.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97208
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint for creating push mirrors (`POST /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/push_mirrors`) checked only whether mirroring was enabled and not the `[mirror] DISABLE_NEW_PUSH` setting that the web interface enforces. A repository administrator could therefore create new push mirrors on instances where the site administrator had disabled them. A push mirror pushes all refs of the repository to a remote chosen by the caller, on each commit or on a schedule.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-96594
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint `GET /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/media/{filepath}` wrote files of up to 1 KiB that are stored directly in Git, not in LFS, to the response without the content type and disposition headers Gitea uses for user content. An HTML file committed to a repository was therefore rendered by the browser on the Gitea origin. A user who can push to a repository could run JavaScript in the session of a victim who opens the media URL and act with the victim's permissions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-89182
SUMMARY

With `[repository] FORCE_PRIVATE = true`, Gitea creates new repositories as private, but the post-receive hook still applied the `repo.private=false` push option to an empty repository created by push. Any user who can create repositories could make their new repository public in violation of the instance policy. The default configuration is not affected.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-86684
SUMMARY

The Gitea push mirror API checked whether the repository owner, instead of the requesting user, may use local file system paths. On instances with `[security] IMPORT_LOCAL_PATHS = true`, a repository administrator who is not allowed to import local paths could add a push mirror to a local path on the server when the repository owner has that permission. Gitea then pushed the repository's refs into an existing Git repository at that path with the permissions of the Gitea process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA