Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Canon Business Process ServicesCanon Business Process Services
VS
Grupo Souza LimaGrupo Souza Lima
Canon Business Process Services

Canon Business Process Services

125 Park Avenue, 9th Floor, None, New York, NY, US, 10017

Last Update: 21/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://cbps.canon.com
760/1000Fair

Canon Business Process Services helps clients enable business agility, digital transformation and lead an increasingly evolving workforce. We solve these challenges by leveraging our experienced team backed by Six Sigma expertise and best-in-class technology. With profe...

NAICS:541615
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:2,435
Subsidiaries:4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Grupo Souza Lima

Grupo Souza Lima

Rua Professor Miguel Russiano 65, São Paulo, 03502-030, BR

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.souzalima.com
779/1000Fair

Sempre inovador, o Grupo Souza Lima desenvolve soluções completas e híbridas, que realmente funcionam, em serviços de Segurança, Limpeza e Facilities. Essas soluções já são realidade para clientes Souza Lima e integram colaboradores treinados com tecnologia avançada par...

NAICS:541615
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:10,627
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Canon Business Process Services

Canon Business Process Services

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Grupo Souza Lima

Grupo Souza Lima

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Outsourcing and Offshoring Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Canon Business Process Services in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Outsourcing and Offshoring Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Grupo Souza Lima in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Canon Business Process Services (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Canon Business Process Services cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Grupo Souza Lima (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Grupo Souza Lima cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Canon Business Process Services

Canon Business Process Services

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Grupo Souza Lima

Grupo Souza Lima

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Canon Business Process Services company and Grupo Souza Lima company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Canon Business Process Services company and Grupo Souza Lima company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Canon Business Process Services company and Grupo Souza Lima company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Canon Business Process Services company and Grupo Souza Lima company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Canon Business Process Services company and Grupo Souza Lima company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Canon Business Process Services company and Grupo Souza Lima company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Canon Business Process Services company and Grupo Souza Lima company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Canon Business Process Services company and Grupo Souza Lima company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Canon Business Process Services company and Grupo Souza Lima company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Canon Business Process Services company and Grupo Souza Lima company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Canon Business Process Services company and Grupo Souza Lima company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Canon Business Process Services and Grupo Souza Lima, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Canon Business Process Services and Grupo Souza Lima, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Canon Business Process Services or Grupo Souza Lima ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Canon Business Process Services or Grupo Souza Lima ?
Between Canon Business Process Services and Grupo Souza Lima, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Canon Business Process Services and Grupo Souza Lima, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1