Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

CANCAN
VS
MRVMRV
CAN

CAN

Smeckley Wood Close, Chesterfield Trading Estate, Chesterfield, None, GB, S41 9PZ

Last Update: 06/12/2025

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.can.ltd.uk
755/1000Fair

For over 30 years CAN has been helping businesses with specialist geotechnical and structural services. Passionate about solutions, all projects are approached on an individual basis and problems will be solved using innovations specific to your requirements. We cover...

NAICS:237
NAICS Definition:Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction
Employees:189
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
MRV

MRV

Av. Prof. Mario Werneck, 621, Belo Horizonte, 30.455-610, BR

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.mrv.com.br
795/1000Fair

Some 45 years ago, we set out with the ambitious goal of providing affordable housing, working to make Brazilian dreams come true. Over the last few years, we have crafted and shaped our story, becoming a brand-leading platform that offers a variety of housing solutions...

NAICS:237
NAICS Definition:Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction
Employees:17,156
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
CAN

CAN

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
MRV

MRV

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Civil Engineering Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CAN in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Civil Engineering Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for MRV in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - CAN (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CAN cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - MRV (X = Date, Y = Severity)

MRV cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
CAN

CAN

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
MRV

MRV

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between CAN company and MRV company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between CAN company and MRV company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between CAN company and MRV company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between CAN company and MRV company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between CAN company and MRV company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between CAN company and MRV company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between CAN company and MRV company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between CAN company and MRV company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between CAN company and MRV company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between CAN company and MRV company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between CAN company and MRV company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between CAN and MRV, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between CAN and MRV, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - CAN or MRV ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - CAN or MRV ?
Between CAN and MRV, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between CAN and MRV, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-74250
SUMMARY

In OpenStack Ironic before 38.0.1, the autodetect deploy interface may fail to run cleaning immediately after enrollment with, or changing to, the autodetect deploy interface.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-74247
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. A user with FEATURE_BUILD_SUPPORT enabled and repository write access can exploit a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability within the build API. This allows the user to provide a malicious URL, causing the Quay builder to make requests to internal network addresses. Such an action could lead to the disclosure of sensitive internal information.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.2
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-74245
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's exported logs feature. An unauthenticated attacker with a valid file ID could download exported action logs without proper authorization. While file IDs are complex, they can be intercepted from plaintext email or webhook callbacks. This vulnerability leads to information disclosure, potentially exposing sensitive data such as usernames, email addresses, IP addresses, and action-specific metadata.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-74244
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's Stripe billing webhook handler. This vulnerability allows an unauthenticated attacker to forge billing events by sending crafted JSON requests to the `/webhooks/stripe` endpoint without validating the Stripe-Signature header. Successful exploitation can lead to the unauthorized resetting of a namespace's build quota to its maximum and trigger unsolicited billing emails to namespace administrators.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-74243
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. When the SECURITY_SCANNER_V4_PSK (pre-shared key) is not set, a remote unauthenticated attacker can send POST requests to the security scanner notification endpoint. This allows the attacker to flood the notification queue and inject path traversal characters into Clair API URL paths. The primary consequence is worker resource exhaustion and blind path manipulation on the configured Clair host, potentially leading to a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9