Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Campus FranceCampus France
VS
The University of New MexicoThe University of New Mexico
Campus France

Campus France

28, rue de la Grange aux Belles, Paris, 75010, FR

Last Update: 10/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.campusfrance.org
758/1000Fair

The new French agency aims at promoting higher education, welcoming students and professionals and promoting international mobility. Campus France Agency was created by law on the July 27th, 2010. It is a public institution (EPIC) in charge of promoting higher educat...

NAICS:6113
NAICS Definition:Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees:595
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
The University of New Mexico

The University of New Mexico

1 University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, nm, US, 87131

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.unm.edu
793/1000Fair

Founded in 1889, The University of New Mexico now occupies 600 acres along old Route 66 in the heart of Albuquerque, a city of more than 700,000 people. From the magnificent mesas to the west, past the banks of the historic Rio Grande to the Sandia Mountains to the east...

NAICS:6113
NAICS Definition:Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees:11,179
Subsidiaries:5
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Campus France

Campus France

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
The University of New Mexico

The University of New Mexico

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

Campus France has 41.18% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The University of New Mexico in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Campus France (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Campus France cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - The University of New Mexico (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The University of New Mexico cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Campus France

Campus France

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
GRICAM1769683332
The University of New Mexico

The University of New Mexico

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Campus France company and The University of New Mexico company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Campus France company and The University of New Mexico company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Campus France company and The University of New Mexico company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Campus France company and The University of New Mexico company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Campus France company and The University of New Mexico company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Campus France company and The University of New Mexico company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Campus France company and The University of New Mexico company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Campus France company and The University of New Mexico company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Campus France company and The University of New Mexico company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Campus France company and The University of New Mexico company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Campus France company and The University of New Mexico company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Campus France and The University of New Mexico, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Campus France and The University of New Mexico, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Campus France or The University of New Mexico ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Campus France or The University of New Mexico ?
Between Campus France and The University of New Mexico, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Campus France and The University of New Mexico, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1