Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

CAMESCAMES
VS
Cleveland ClinicCleveland Clinic
CAMES

CAMES

undefined, Capital Region of Denmark, undefined, undefined, DK

Last Update: 16/01/2026

View Profile

​CAMES - Copenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation - gathers the Capital Region of Denmark's research, development and educational activities within the field of medical and surgical simulation. The purpose of all of CAMES'​ activities is to increase the ...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:236
Subsidiaries:20
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Cleveland Clinic

Cleveland Clinic

9500 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, US

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
796/1000Fair

Cleveland Clinic, located in Cleveland, Ohio, is a not-for-profit, multispecialty academic medical center that integrates clinical and hospital care with research and education. Founded in 1921 by four renowned physicians with a vision of providing outstanding patient ...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:48,436
Subsidiaries:14
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
CAMES

CAMES

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Cleveland Clinic

Cleveland Clinic

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CAMES in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cleveland Clinic in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - CAMES (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CAMES cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Cleveland Clinic (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cleveland Clinic cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
CAMES

CAMES

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Cleveland Clinic

Cleveland Clinic

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
CLE934311022

FAQ

Between CAMES company and Cleveland Clinic company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between CAMES company and Cleveland Clinic company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between CAMES company and Cleveland Clinic company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between CAMES company and Cleveland Clinic company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between CAMES company and Cleveland Clinic company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between CAMES company and Cleveland Clinic company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between CAMES company and Cleveland Clinic company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between CAMES company and Cleveland Clinic company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between CAMES company and Cleveland Clinic company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between CAMES company and Cleveland Clinic company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between CAMES company and Cleveland Clinic company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between CAMES and Cleveland Clinic, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between CAMES and Cleveland Clinic, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - CAMES or Cleveland Clinic ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - CAMES or Cleveland Clinic ?
Between CAMES and Cleveland Clinic, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between CAMES and Cleveland Clinic, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2