Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

CaltransCaltrans
VS
City of AmsterdamCity of Amsterdam
Caltrans

Caltrans

1120 N Street, Sacramento, CA, US, 95814

Last Update: 29/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.dot.ca.gov/
781/1000Fair

From scenic backroads to the busiest freeways, Caltrans keeps California moving. We manage more than 50,000 miles of highway and freeway lanes, support intercity rail service, permit over 400 public-use airports and hospital heliports, and partner with local agencies to...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:12,719
Subsidiaries:29
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
City of Amsterdam

City of Amsterdam

Postbus 202, Amsterdam, 1000 AE, NL

Last Update: 14/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.amsterdam.nl
788/1000Fair

Working for Amsterdam means working for the most beautiful city in the world. Think of its rich history, the role Amsterdam plays internationally, and events such as Sail, Gay Pride and King’s Day. Of course everybody wants to visit Amsterdam, or work or live here. As ...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:19,929
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Caltrans

Caltrans

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
City of Amsterdam

City of Amsterdam

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Caltrans in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for City of Amsterdam in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Caltrans (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Caltrans cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - City of Amsterdam (X = Date, Y = Severity)

City of Amsterdam cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Caltrans

Caltrans

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
City of Amsterdam

City of Amsterdam

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Caltrans company and City of Amsterdam company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Caltrans company and City of Amsterdam company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Caltrans company and City of Amsterdam company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Caltrans company and City of Amsterdam company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Caltrans company and City of Amsterdam company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Caltrans company and City of Amsterdam company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Caltrans company and City of Amsterdam company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Caltrans company and City of Amsterdam company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Caltrans company and City of Amsterdam company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Caltrans company and City of Amsterdam company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Caltrans company and City of Amsterdam company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Caltrans and City of Amsterdam, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Caltrans and City of Amsterdam, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Caltrans or City of Amsterdam ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Caltrans or City of Amsterdam ?
Between Caltrans and City of Amsterdam, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Caltrans and City of Amsterdam, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-97032
SUMMARY

HTTP/2 servers could end up crashing due to inadvertently modifying its HPACK encoder concurrently. This happens because the server modifies the HPACK encoder from two goroutines without synchronization: one uses the encoder to encode a HEADERS frame as part of a response sent to a client and the other modifies the encoder's table size when handling a SETTINGS frame containing SETTINGS_HEADER_TABLE_SIZE that a client sends. A malicious client can repeatedly send a request while changing the header table size to crash the server.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97031
SUMMARY

Multiple ECH outer extension references are not permitted under RFC 9849; previously, a client could send a well-crafted packet that could trigger memory exhaustion in the server process by specifying multiple references. We now reject these as malformed and curb the memory amplification vector as a result.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97030
SUMMARY

A trusted template author may have previously written a valid template wherein the use of the 'yield' keyword would not be correctly escaped. We now ensure that valid keyword uses are escaped and non-keyword uses are not escaped.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-96207
SUMMARY

Improper certificate validation in Microsoft Partner Center allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-94510
SUMMARY

Authorization bypass through user-controlled key in Microsoft Bookings allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:H/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
5.3
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9