Comparison Overview
Caltrans

Caltrans
1120 N Street, Sacramento, CA, US, 95814
Last Update: 29/03/2026
From scenic backroads to the busiest freeways, Caltrans keeps California moving. We manage more than 50,000 miles of highway and freeway lanes, support intercity rail service, permit over 400 public-use airports and hospital heliports, and partner with local agencies to...

County of Santa Clara
70 W. Hedding St., San Jose, 95110, US
Last Update: 01/04/2026
The County of Santa Clara is located at the southern end of the San Francisco Bay and encompasses 1,312 square miles. It has one of the highest median family incomes in the country, and a wide diversity of cultures, backgrounds and talents. The County of Santa Clara c...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Caltrans







County of Santa Clara






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Caltrans in 2026.
Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for County of Santa Clara in 2026.
Incident History - Caltrans (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Caltrans cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - County of Santa Clara (X = Date, Y = Severity)
County of Santa Clara cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Caltrans

County of Santa Clara
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
A vulnerability was identified in ealpha072 Student-Management-System up to 01451bd7a2f58cdda07bd0b86e3967582e3ecd08. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the file admin/config.php of the component Administrative Backend. Such manipulation leads to improper authentication. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is publicly available and might be used. This product utilizes a rolling release system for continuous delivery, and as such, version information for affected or updated releases is not disclosed. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.
A vulnerability was determined in sgl-project SGLang up to 0.5.11. Affected by this vulnerability is the function data_hash of the component Cache Handler. This manipulation causes denial of service. The attack is restricted to local execution. A high degree of complexity is needed for the attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized. The pull request to fix this issue awaits acceptance.
Active IQ OneCollect version 2.7.3 contains hard-coded credentials that could allow an authenticated attacker with low privileges to perform unauthorized AutoSupport operations.
Active IQ Config Advisor version 6.7.3 contains hard-coded credentials that could allow an authenticated attacker with low privileges to perform unauthorized AutoSupport operations.
A vulnerability was found in crmeb crmeb_java 1.4. Affected is the function RestTemplate.getForEntity of the file crmeb-common/src/main/java/com/zbkj/common/utils/RestTemplateUtil.java of the component base64 Qrcode Endpoint. The manipulation of the argument url results in server-side request forgery. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been made public and could be used. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.