Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

CalEPACalEPA
VS
Lee County Clerk of the Circuit Court & ComptrollerLee County Clerk of the Circuit Court & Comptroller
CalEPA

CalEPA

1001 I St, Sacramento, 95814, US

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.calepa.ca.gov/
717/1000Moderate

In 1991, California's environmental authority was unified in a single Cabinet level agency—the California Environmental Protection Agency (CalEPA). Our mission is to restore, protect and enhance the environment, to ensure public health, environmental quality and economi...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:203
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1
Lee County Clerk of the Circuit Court & Comptroller

Lee County Clerk of the Circuit Court & Comptroller

US

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://leeclerk.org
702/1000Moderate

The Clerk of the Circuit Court & Comptroller is an independently elected public trustee established by the Florida Constitution. The Clerk is responsible for safeguarding public records and public funds for the people of Lee County. In addition to the role of Clerk of t...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:390
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
CalEPA

CalEPA

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Lee County Clerk of the Circuit Court & Comptroller

Lee County Clerk of the Circuit Court & Comptroller

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CalEPA in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lee County Clerk of the Circuit Court & Comptroller in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - CalEPA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CalEPA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Lee County Clerk of the Circuit Court & Comptroller (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lee County Clerk of the Circuit Court & Comptroller cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
CalEPA

CalEPA

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
CAL032090625
🔒 Incident : Breach
CAL022091825
Lee County Clerk of the Circuit Court & Comptroller

Lee County Clerk of the Circuit Court & Comptroller

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
LEE5762357111125

FAQ

Between CalEPA company and Lee County Clerk of the Circuit Court & Comptroller company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between CalEPA company and Lee County Clerk of the Circuit Court & Comptroller company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between CalEPA company and Lee County Clerk of the Circuit Court & Comptroller company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between CalEPA company and Lee County Clerk of the Circuit Court & Comptroller company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between CalEPA company and Lee County Clerk of the Circuit Court & Comptroller company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between CalEPA company and Lee County Clerk of the Circuit Court & Comptroller company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between CalEPA company and Lee County Clerk of the Circuit Court & Comptroller company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between CalEPA company and Lee County Clerk of the Circuit Court & Comptroller company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between CalEPA company and Lee County Clerk of the Circuit Court & Comptroller company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between CalEPA company and Lee County Clerk of the Circuit Court & Comptroller company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between CalEPA company and Lee County Clerk of the Circuit Court & Comptroller company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between CalEPA and Lee County Clerk of the Circuit Court & Comptroller, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between CalEPA and Lee County Clerk of the Circuit Court & Comptroller, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - CalEPA or Lee County Clerk of the Circuit Court & Comptroller ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - CalEPA or Lee County Clerk of the Circuit Court & Comptroller ?
Between CalEPA and Lee County Clerk of the Circuit Court & Comptroller, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between CalEPA and Lee County Clerk of the Circuit Court & Comptroller, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1