Comparison Overview

California Department of Finance

VS

I work for NSW

California Department of Finance

915 L St, None, Sacramento, California, US, 95814
Last Update: 2025-12-09
View Profile
Between 650 and 699
http://www.dof.ca.gov

Through a year-long process, the Department of Finance prepares, explains and administers California's annual financial plan, the California Budget. The Governor submits the Governor's Budget to the Legislature in January, it is revised in May, and the fiscal year begins July 1. Mission Statement: • Serve as the Governor’s chief fiscal policy advisor. • Promote responsible resource allocation through the state’s annual financial plan. • Ensure the financial integrity of the state. Core Values: Finance has a strong history of laudably fulfilling its responsibilities. That history of performance has garnered the Department respect from successive Administrations and Legislatures and earned it a reputation as a venerable institution. The foundation of this reputation is a set of core values that guide the actions of the employees who, collectively, are the Department of Finance. • Integrity • Expertise • Teamwork • Respect • Problem Solving

NAICS: 92
NAICS Definition: Public Administration
Employees: 313
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
View Profile

I work for NSW

undefined, Sydney, NSW, 2000, AU
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799
http://iworkfor.nsw.gov.au/

The NSW public sector includes ten departments and many agencies and organisations working together to develop policy and deliver important services such as health, education, housing, transport and infrastructure across NSW. We are over 300,000 dedicated people who share the same values - making a difference, giving back and responding to the future. Read our community guidelines: bit.ly/PD-community-guidelines

NAICS: 92
NAICS Definition: Public Administration
Employees: 59,726
Subsidiaries: 17
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
4

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/california-department-of-finance.jpeg
California Department of Finance
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nsw-government.jpeg
I work for NSW
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
California Department of Finance
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
I work for NSW
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for California Department of Finance in 2025.

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for I work for NSW in 2025.

Incident History — California Department of Finance (X = Date, Y = Severity)

California Department of Finance cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — I work for NSW (X = Date, Y = Severity)

I work for NSW cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/california-department-of-finance.jpeg
California Department of Finance
Incidents

Date Detected: 12/2022
Type:Ransomware
Motivation: Financial
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nsw-government.jpeg
I work for NSW
Incidents

Date Detected: 02/2022
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Accidental Exposure
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 07/2021
Type:Cyber Attack
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 2/2021
Type:Ransomware
Motivation: financial gain, data exfiltration
Blog: Blog

FAQ

I work for NSW company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to California Department of Finance company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

I work for NSW company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to California Department of Finance company.

In the current year, I work for NSW company and California Department of Finance company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Both I work for NSW company and California Department of Finance company have confirmed experiencing at least one ransomware attack.

I work for NSW company has disclosed at least one data breach, while California Department of Finance company has not reported such incidents publicly.

I work for NSW company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while California Department of Finance company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither California Department of Finance company nor I work for NSW company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither California Department of Finance nor I work for NSW holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

I work for NSW company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to California Department of Finance company.

I work for NSW company employs more people globally than California Department of Finance company, reflecting its scale as a Government Administration.

Neither California Department of Finance nor I work for NSW holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither California Department of Finance nor I work for NSW holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither California Department of Finance nor I work for NSW holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither California Department of Finance nor I work for NSW holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither California Department of Finance nor I work for NSW holds HIPAA certification.

Neither California Department of Finance nor I work for NSW holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

FreePBX Endpoint Manager is a module for managing telephony endpoints in FreePBX systems. Versions prior to 16.0.96 and 17.0.1 through 17.0.9 have a weak default password. By default, this is a 6 digit numeric value which can be brute forced. (This is the app_password parameter). Depending on local configuration, this password could be the extension, voicemail, user manager, DPMA or EPM phone admin password. This issue is fixed in versions 16.0.96 and 17.0.10.

Published
Date
2025-12-10
Updated
Date
2025-12-10
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Neuron is a PHP framework for creating and orchestrating AI Agents. In versions 2.8.11 and below, the MySQLWriteTool executes arbitrary SQL provided by the caller using PDO::prepare() + execute() without semantic restrictions. This is consistent with the name (“write tool”), but in an LLM/agent context it becomes a high-risk capability: prompt injection or indirect prompt manipulation can cause execution of destructive queries such as DROP TABLE, TRUNCATE, DELETE, ALTER, or privilege-related statements (subject to DB permissions). Deployments that expose an agent with MySQLWriteTool enabled to untrusted input and/or run the tool with a DB user that has broad privileges are impacted. This issue is fixed in version 2.8.12.

Published
Date
2025-12-10
Updated
Date
2025-12-10
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Neuron is a PHP framework for creating and orchestrating AI Agents. Versions 2.8.11 and below use MySQLSelectTool, which is vulnerable to Read-Only Bypass. MySQLSelectTool is intended to be a read-only SQL tool (e.g., for LLM agent querying, however, validation based on the first keyword (e.g., SELECT) and a forbidden-keyword list does not block file-writing constructs such as INTO OUTFILE / INTO DUMPFILE. As a result, an attacker who can influence the tool input (e.g., via prompt injection through a public agent endpoint) may write arbitrary files to the DB server if the MySQL/MariaDB account has the FILE privilege and server configuration permits writes to a useful location (e.g., a web-accessible directory). This issue is fixed in version 2.8.12.

Published
Date
2025-12-10
Updated
Date
2025-12-10
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Okta Java Management SDK facilitates interactions with the Okta management API. In versions 11.0.0 through 20.0.0, race conditions may arise from concurrent requests using the ApiClient class. This could cause a status code or response header from one request’s response to influence another request’s response. This issue is fixed in version 20.0.1.

Published
Date
2025-12-10
Updated
Date
2025-12-10
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L
References
Description

The Auth0 Next.js SDK is a library for implementing user authentication in Next.js applications. When using versions 4.11.0 through 4.11.2 and 4.12.0, simultaneous requests on the same client may result in improper lookups in the TokenRequestCache for the request results. This issue is fixed in versions 4.11.2 and 4.12.1.

Published
Date
2025-12-10
Updated
Date
2025-12-10
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
References