Comparison Overview

CA Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation

VS

SAPS

CA Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation

1515 S St, Sacramento, CA, US, 95811
Last Update: 2025-12-10
View Profile
Between 600 and 649
http://www.cdcr.ca.gov/

Founded in 1885, the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) serves as one of the nation's largest, and most diverse correctional departments. Our mission is to facilitate the successful reintegration of the individuals in our care back to their communities equipped with the tools to be drug-free, healthy, and employable members of society by providing education, treatment, rehabilitative, and restorative justice programs, all in a safe and humane environment. The California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) and California Correctional Health Care Services (CCHCS) are committed to building and fostering a diverse workplace. We believe cultural diversity, backgrounds, experiences, perspectives, and unique identities should be honored, valued, and supported. We believe all staff should be empowered. CDCR/CCHCS are proud to foster inclusion and representation at all levels of both Departments.

NAICS: 92212
NAICS Definition: Police Protection
Employees: 4,127
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
10
Attack type number
2
View Profile

SAPS

ZA
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799
http://www.saps.gov.za

Policing in South Africa. I am attached to the newly formed Directorate for Priority Crime Investigations. Formally I was attached to the Detecitve Service and have been conduction investigations for over 25 years. I have also been attached to the National Inspectorate Division of the SAPS for soem 10 years.

NAICS: 92212
NAICS Definition: Police Protection
Employees: 15,336
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/california-department-of-corrections-and-rehabilitation.jpeg
CA Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
SAPS
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
CA Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
SAPS
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Law Enforcement Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CA Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation in 2025.

Incidents vs Law Enforcement Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SAPS in 2025.

Incident History — CA Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CA Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — SAPS (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SAPS cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/california-department-of-corrections-and-rehabilitation.jpeg
CA Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation
Incidents

Date Detected: 1/2022
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Human Error
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 12/2021
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 6/2020
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Suspicious activity in a file transfer system
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
SAPS
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

SAPS company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to CA Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

CA Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas SAPS company has not reported any.

In the current year, SAPS company and CA Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither SAPS company nor CA Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

CA Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other SAPS company has not reported such incidents publicly.

CA Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while SAPS company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither CA Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation company nor SAPS company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither CA Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation nor SAPS holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither CA Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation company nor SAPS company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

SAPS company employs more people globally than CA Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation company, reflecting its scale as a Law Enforcement.

Neither CA Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation nor SAPS holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither CA Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation nor SAPS holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither CA Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation nor SAPS holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither CA Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation nor SAPS holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither CA Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation nor SAPS holds HIPAA certification.

Neither CA Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation nor SAPS holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References