Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Crédit Agricole Leasing & Factoring Belgium BranchCrédit Agricole Leasing & Factoring Belgium Branch
VS
CapitecCapitec
Crédit Agricole Leasing & Factoring Belgium Branch

Crédit Agricole Leasing & Factoring Belgium Branch

Rue du Trône 60, Brussels, 1050, BE

Last Update: 27/12/2025

View Profile

Crédit Agricole Leasing & Factoring S.A. - Belgium Branch* is the branch of the French public limited company CA Leasing & Factoring S.A. in Paris and offers factoring services for companies. As part of the Crédit Agricole Group (parent company), Crédit Agricole Leasin...

NAICS:52211
NAICS Definition:Commercial Banking
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:53
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Capitec

Capitec

5 Neutron Road, Stellenbosch, Western Cape, ZA, 7600

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.capitecbank.co.za
802/1000Good

Imagine simple, affordable banking solutions that work for you – just like it does for over 25 million South Africans. They’re banking smart, paying less and getting more value every day with us. As the country’s leading digital bank, we’re proud to have been voted th...

NAICS:52211
NAICS Definition:Commercial Banking
Employees:22,087
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Crédit Agricole Leasing & Factoring Belgium Branch

Crédit Agricole Leasing & Factoring Belgium Branch

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Capitec

Capitec

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Banking Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Crédit Agricole Leasing & Factoring Belgium Branch in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Banking Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Capitec in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Crédit Agricole Leasing & Factoring Belgium Branch (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Crédit Agricole Leasing & Factoring Belgium Branch cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Capitec (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Capitec cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Crédit Agricole Leasing & Factoring Belgium Branch

Crédit Agricole Leasing & Factoring Belgium Branch

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Capitec

Capitec

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Crédit Agricole Leasing & Factoring Belgium Branch company and Capitec company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Crédit Agricole Leasing & Factoring Belgium Branch company and Capitec company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Crédit Agricole Leasing & Factoring Belgium Branch company and Capitec company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Crédit Agricole Leasing & Factoring Belgium Branch company and Capitec company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Crédit Agricole Leasing & Factoring Belgium Branch company and Capitec company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Crédit Agricole Leasing & Factoring Belgium Branch company and Capitec company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Crédit Agricole Leasing & Factoring Belgium Branch company and Capitec company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Crédit Agricole Leasing & Factoring Belgium Branch company and Capitec company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Crédit Agricole Leasing & Factoring Belgium Branch company and Capitec company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Crédit Agricole Leasing & Factoring Belgium Branch company and Capitec company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Crédit Agricole Leasing & Factoring Belgium Branch company and Capitec company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Crédit Agricole Leasing & Factoring Belgium Branch and Capitec, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Crédit Agricole Leasing & Factoring Belgium Branch and Capitec, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Crédit Agricole Leasing & Factoring Belgium Branch or Capitec ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Crédit Agricole Leasing & Factoring Belgium Branch or Capitec ?
Between Crédit Agricole Leasing & Factoring Belgium Branch and Capitec, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Crédit Agricole Leasing & Factoring Belgium Branch and Capitec, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1