Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Cal Poly HumboldtCal Poly Humboldt
VS
University of OklahomaUniversity of Oklahoma
Cal Poly Humboldt

Cal Poly Humboldt

1 Harpst St, Arcata, California, 95521, US

Last Update: 19/12/2025

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.humboldt.edu/
780/1000Fair

At Cal Poly Humboldt, bold hearts and open minds shape the future. Founded in 1913, Cal Poly Humboldt began as a small college for teachers. Today Humboldt has grown into a comprehensive university with rigorous science and liberal arts programs. Designated a polytech...

NAICS:6113
NAICS Definition:Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees:2,575
Subsidiaries:40
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
University of Oklahoma

University of Oklahoma

660 N Parrington Oval, Norman, Oklahoma, US, 73019

Last Update: 07/05/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://ou.edu
727/1000Moderate

Attracting top students from across the nation and more than 100 countries around the world, OU provides a major university experience in a private college atmosphere. In fact, OU is number one in the nation in the number of National Merit Scholars enrolled at a public...

NAICS:6113
NAICS Definition:Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees:11,504
Subsidiaries:3
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Cal Poly Humboldt

Cal Poly Humboldt

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
University of Oklahoma

University of Oklahoma

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cal Poly Humboldt in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

University of Oklahoma has 3.85% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Cal Poly Humboldt (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cal Poly Humboldt cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - University of Oklahoma (X = Date, Y = Severity)

University of Oklahoma cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Cal Poly Humboldt

Cal Poly Humboldt

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
University of Oklahoma

University of Oklahoma

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
UNIINS1778196407
🔒 Incident : Breach
UNI53201022

FAQ

Between Cal Poly Humboldt company and University of Oklahoma company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Cal Poly Humboldt company and University of Oklahoma company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Cal Poly Humboldt company and University of Oklahoma company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Cal Poly Humboldt company and University of Oklahoma company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Cal Poly Humboldt company and University of Oklahoma company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Cal Poly Humboldt company and University of Oklahoma company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Cal Poly Humboldt company and University of Oklahoma company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Cal Poly Humboldt company and University of Oklahoma company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Cal Poly Humboldt company and University of Oklahoma company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Cal Poly Humboldt company and University of Oklahoma company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Cal Poly Humboldt company and University of Oklahoma company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Cal Poly Humboldt and University of Oklahoma, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Cal Poly Humboldt and University of Oklahoma, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Cal Poly Humboldt or University of Oklahoma ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Cal Poly Humboldt or University of Oklahoma ?
Between Cal Poly Humboldt and University of Oklahoma, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Cal Poly Humboldt and University of Oklahoma, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1