Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Center for Agriculture and Food SystemsCenter for Agriculture and Food Systems
VS
Brigham Young UniversityBrigham Young University
Center for Agriculture and Food Systems

Center for Agriculture and Food Systems

South Royalton, 05068, US

Last Update: 08/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://cafs.vermontlaw.edu
770/1000Fair

The Center for Agriculture and Food Systems (CAFS) is a research-based institute housed at Vermont Law and Graduate School. With law and master’s students, CAFS produces original scholarly research in the field of food and agriculture law and policy to serve the broades...

NAICS:6113
NAICS Definition:Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Brigham Young University

Brigham Young University

Main Campus, Provo, UT, US, 84602

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
https://byu.edu
800/1000Good

We believe a world yearning for hope and joy needs the graduates of Brigham Young University—disciples of Jesus Christ who are driven by love for God and His children and who are prepared to serve and lead. This preparation demands a unique university model: at BYU, bel...

NAICS:6113
NAICS Definition:Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees:16,614
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Center for Agriculture and Food Systems

Center for Agriculture and Food Systems

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Brigham Young University

Brigham Young University

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Center for Agriculture and Food Systems in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Brigham Young University in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Center for Agriculture and Food Systems (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Center for Agriculture and Food Systems cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Brigham Young University (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Brigham Young University cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Center for Agriculture and Food Systems

Center for Agriculture and Food Systems

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Brigham Young University

Brigham Young University

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Data Leak
BRI21381123

FAQ

Between Center for Agriculture and Food Systems company and Brigham Young University company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Center for Agriculture and Food Systems company and Brigham Young University company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Center for Agriculture and Food Systems company and Brigham Young University company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Center for Agriculture and Food Systems company and Brigham Young University company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Center for Agriculture and Food Systems company and Brigham Young University company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Center for Agriculture and Food Systems company and Brigham Young University company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Center for Agriculture and Food Systems company and Brigham Young University company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Center for Agriculture and Food Systems company and Brigham Young University company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Center for Agriculture and Food Systems company and Brigham Young University company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Center for Agriculture and Food Systems company and Brigham Young University company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Center for Agriculture and Food Systems company and Brigham Young University company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Center for Agriculture and Food Systems and Brigham Young University, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Center for Agriculture and Food Systems and Brigham Young University, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Center for Agriculture and Food Systems or Brigham Young University ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Center for Agriculture and Food Systems or Brigham Young University ?
Between Center for Agriculture and Food Systems and Brigham Young University, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Center for Agriculture and Food Systems and Brigham Young University, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-49416
SUMMARY

The CONS_HISTORY ioctl handler did not adequately validate the requested history size. A large value caused an integer overflow in the buffer size calculation, resulting in a heap allocation smaller than expected. Subsequent initialization of the buffer wrote beyond the end of the allocation. An unprivileged local user with access to a vt(4) device can trigger an out-of-bounds write in the kernel, potentially escalating privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49414
SUMMARY

The ELF image activator cleared per-process ASLR preference flags for setuid binaries after the code that computes the PIE base address, rather than before. As a result, a user-requested ASLR disable was still in effect at the point where the base address was chosen. An unprivileged local user can disable ASLR for a setuid PIE binary by calling procctl(2) before execve(2). This makes exploitation of any separate memory corruption vulnerability in that binary significantly easier.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49417
SUMMARY

Second, the audio buffer backing a mapping could be freed when the device was closed even though the mapping remained valid. The freed memory could then be reused elsewhere while still accessible through the stale mapping. The /dev/dsp device nodes are world-accessible by default. On a system with an audio device, either issue allows an unprivileged local user to read and write kernel memory, which can be used to escalate privileges, potentially gaining full control of the affected system. At a minimum, an attacker can crash the kernel, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49413
SUMMARY

The Linuxulator determined whether a binary was set-user-ID or set-group-ID by checking the P_SUGID process flag. During execve(2), this flag is not yet set at the point where the auxiliary vector is constructed, so AT_SECURE was incorrectly set to zero for set-user-ID and set-group-ID executables. An unprivileged local user can inject a shared library via LD_PRELOAD into a set-user-ID or set-group-ID Linux binary, gaining the privileges of that binary.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49412
SUMMARY

The kernel handler for IPV6_MSFILTER dropped a serializing lock in order to copy the source-filter list from userspace, then reacquired the lock. During this window another thread could free the multicast filter structure, leaving the handler with a stale pointer to freed memory. An unprivileged local user can exploit this use-after-free to escalate privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA