Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Caf de la Haute-GaronneCaf de la Haute-Garonne
VS
Etat de VaudEtat de Vaud
Caf de la Haute-Garonne

Caf de la Haute-Garonne

24 rue Riquet, Toulouse, 31000, FR

Last Update: 08/02/2026

View Profile
761/1000Fair

Nous faisons partie de la branche famille de la Sécurité Sociale, composée de la Caisse Nationale des Allocations Familiales (Cnaf) et de 102 Caf réparties sur tout le territoire. Soudés autour des valeurs du service public, nous avons pour mission d’améliorer la vie ...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:273
Subsidiaries:26
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Etat de Vaud

Etat de Vaud

Rue Caroline 4, Lausanne, 1014, CH

Last Update: 31/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.vd.ch/
780/1000Fair

Le canton de Vaud, c’est plus de 800 000 personnes vivant dans plus de 300 communes ! Rejoindre l’Administration cantonale vaudoise, c’est s’engager aux côtés de près de 40’000 personnes unies dans un même but : servir la population. Pourquoi nous suivre ? Dédiez vot...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:10,386
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Caf de la Haute-Garonne

Caf de la Haute-Garonne

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Etat de Vaud

Etat de Vaud

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Caf de la Haute-Garonne in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Etat de Vaud in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Caf de la Haute-Garonne (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Caf de la Haute-Garonne cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Etat de Vaud (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Etat de Vaud cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Caf de la Haute-Garonne

Caf de la Haute-Garonne

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Etat de Vaud

Etat de Vaud

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Caf de la Haute-Garonne company and Etat de Vaud company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Caf de la Haute-Garonne company and Etat de Vaud company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Caf de la Haute-Garonne company and Etat de Vaud company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Caf de la Haute-Garonne company and Etat de Vaud company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Caf de la Haute-Garonne company and Etat de Vaud company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Caf de la Haute-Garonne company and Etat de Vaud company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Caf de la Haute-Garonne company and Etat de Vaud company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Caf de la Haute-Garonne company and Etat de Vaud company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Caf de la Haute-Garonne company and Etat de Vaud company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Caf de la Haute-Garonne company and Etat de Vaud company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Caf de la Haute-Garonne company and Etat de Vaud company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Caf de la Haute-Garonne and Etat de Vaud, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Caf de la Haute-Garonne and Etat de Vaud, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Caf de la Haute-Garonne or Etat de Vaud ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Caf de la Haute-Garonne or Etat de Vaud ?
Between Caf de la Haute-Garonne and Etat de Vaud, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Caf de la Haute-Garonne and Etat de Vaud, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-67595
SUMMARY

VaahCMS versions 2.0.0 through 2.3.4 contain a malicious obfuscated JavaScript payload embedded in the Blade template responsible for rendering security OTP emails, allowing remote attackers to execute unauthorized code in any browser that renders the affected email template with JavaScript enabled. The payload establishes a WebSocket connection to a hardcoded command-and-control endpoint, installs a password-field keylogger using MutationObserver to capture dynamically added inputs, scrapes WhatsApp Web DOM content, and accepts remote commands to redirect or overwrite the rendered page.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-29
UPDATED
Date2026-07-29
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-15157
SUMMARY

undici does not validate the type property of a duck-typed blob-like request body before using it as the Content-Type header on the HTTP/1.1 dispatcher. In undici before 6.28.0, from 7.0.0 up to before 7.29.0, and from 8.0.0 up to before 8.9.0, an application that passes a hand-rolled blob-like body (via request, stream, pipeline, or dispatch) whose type is derived from untrusted input allows an attacker to inject CRLF sequences and append arbitrary HTTP headers, potentially smuggling a second request past the upstream. Native Blob objects are safe because their constructor strips CRLF from the type, and fetch is unaffected because it validates headers, but ecosystem libraries that build duck-typed blob shapes from user input can reach the vulnerable path. This is the same defect class as CVE-2022-35948 and CVE-2026-1527, on a header sink that the earlier fixes did not cover. The issue is fixed in undici 6.28.0, 7.29.0, and 8.9.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-29
UPDATED
Date2026-07-29
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.2
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-14643
SUMMARY

undici's cache interceptor mishandles optional whitespace placed around the equals sign of a qualified no-cache or private Cache-Control directive. In undici from 7.0.0 up to before 7.29.0 and from 8.0.0 up to before 8.9.0, the parser either drops the directive or stores a field name with literal quote characters, so the cache decision fails to recognize the qualification and the response is stored. In shared-cache mode, this lets a response containing one user's authenticated data be served from cache to a later caller, including an unauthenticated one, when both requests resolve to the same cache key. It affects applications that enable the cache interceptor in shared mode, forward Authorization headers upstream, and receive cacheable responses with qualified directives padded with whitespace around the equals sign. This is the whitespace-around-equals variant that the fix for CVE-2026-9678 did not normalize, and it is fixed in undici 7.29.0 and 8.9.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-29
UPDATED
Date2026-07-29
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2025-69945
SUMMARY

kishan0725 Hospital Management System 4.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in /doctor/edit-patient.php?editid=1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-29
UPDATED
Date2026-07-29
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA