Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Caf de l'OiseCaf de l'Oise
VS
National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)
Caf de l'Oise

Caf de l'Oise

2 rue Jules Ferry, Beauvais , 60012, FR

Last Update: 05/03/2026

View Profile

La Caisse d’allocations Familiales de l’Oise est un organisme de Sécurité sociale de droit privé qui assure une mission de service public La Caf de l’Oise appartient à un réseau composé de 101 caisses à vocation départementale, et compte 5 points d’accueils dans le dé...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:78
Subsidiaries:114
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

1000 Independence Avenue SW, Washington, 20585, US

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 650 and 699
http://energy.gov/nnsa
651/1000Weak

Established by Congress in 2000, NNSA is a semi-autonomous agency within the U.S. Department of Energy that protects our nation by designing and delivering a safe, secure, reliable, and effective U.S. nuclear stockpile; forging solutions that enable global security and ...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:47,429
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Caf de l'Oise

Caf de l'Oise

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Caf de l'Oise in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Caf de l'Oise (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Caf de l'Oise cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Caf de l'Oise

Caf de l'Oise

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
NAT349072525
🔒 Incident : Breach
NAT3102231102325

FAQ

Between Caf de l'Oise company and National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Caf de l'Oise company and National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Caf de l'Oise company and National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Caf de l'Oise company and National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Caf de l'Oise company and National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Caf de l'Oise company and National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Caf de l'Oise company and National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Caf de l'Oise company and National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Caf de l'Oise company and National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Caf de l'Oise company and National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Caf de l'Oise company and National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Caf de l'Oise and National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA), which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Caf de l'Oise and National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA), which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Caf de l'Oise or National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Caf de l'Oise or National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) ?
Between Caf de l'Oise and National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA), which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Caf de l'Oise and National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA), which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-90461
SUMMARY

OpenStack Ironic through 38.0.0 may send a username and password to an unexpected remote host when Image Service is configured for HTTP(S) Basic Authentication.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-90460
SUMMARY

An issue was discovered in OpenStack Keystone before 29.0.3. Tokens obtained via delegated authentication methods (EC2 credentials, application credentials, OAuth1 access tokens, and trusts) are not blocked from creating, modifying, or deleting credentials via the /v3/credentials API. EC2-derived tokens can additionally read credential blobs, exposing TOTP MFA seeds and other secrets. Also, PATCH /v3/credentials does not validate the requested post-update project_id, allowing any delegated token to move a credential to an unauthorized project. All Keystone deployments using delegated authentication are affected.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-90457
SUMMARY

The administrative password is hashed using a comparatively weak, fast algorithm for the credential store backing one authentication path, and the file containing that hash is written with permissions allowing it to be read by any local user. This is inconsistent with a separate, stronger hashing algorithm used for the same password on another authentication path. A party able to read this file, including a local user or a party with access to a configuration backup, could feasibly recover the underlying password through offline computation, compromising the administrative credential across every path that accepts it.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-90456
SUMMARY

An example environment-configuration file for a bundled inventory-management component ships with a fixed, publicly-known administrative password. A deployment that copies this example file into active configuration without running the setup routine that regenerates credentials will expose that component's administrative interface to anyone aware of the default value.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-90455
SUMMARY

A prior update that raised a bundled HTTP client library to a version remediating known vulnerabilities was later reverted, reintroducing the earlier, vulnerable version into a log-processing component. The only code path in that component using the library issues a request to a single fixed, trusted vendor URL at initialization and does not process attacker-controlled input through the library, limiting practical exploitability of the reintroduced version in this context.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA