Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Caisse nationale des allocations familiales - CnafCaisse nationale des allocations familiales - Cnaf
VS
RijkswaterstaatRijkswaterstaat
Caisse nationale des allocations familiales - Cnaf

Caisse nationale des allocations familiales - Cnaf

paris, FR

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile

Les Allocations familiales, c’est d’abord un réseau composé de la Caisse nationale d’Allocations familiales (Cnaf),composée de 11 sites, et de 101 Caf réparties sur tout le territoire français (Métropole et Outre-Mer). Les Caisses d’allocations familiales, plus connu...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:4,199
Subsidiaries:5
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
Rijkswaterstaat

Rijkswaterstaat

Koningskade 4, Den Haag, 2500 EX, NL

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
783/1000Fair

Rijkswaterstaat is de uitvoeringsorganisatie van het Ministerie van Infrastructuur en Waterstaat. We beheren en ontwikkelen de rijkswegen, -vaarwegen en –wateren en zetten in op een duurzame leefomgeving. Samen met andere organisaties werken we aan een land dat bescher...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:12,096
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Caisse nationale des allocations familiales - Cnaf

Caisse nationale des allocations familiales - Cnaf

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Rijkswaterstaat

Rijkswaterstaat

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Caisse nationale des allocations familiales - Cnaf in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Rijkswaterstaat in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Caisse nationale des allocations familiales - Cnaf (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Caisse nationale des allocations familiales - Cnaf cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Rijkswaterstaat (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Rijkswaterstaat cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Caisse nationale des allocations familiales - Cnaf

Caisse nationale des allocations familiales - Cnaf

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
MINCAF1766073386
Rijkswaterstaat

Rijkswaterstaat

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Caisse nationale des allocations familiales - Cnaf company and Rijkswaterstaat company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Caisse nationale des allocations familiales - Cnaf company and Rijkswaterstaat company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Caisse nationale des allocations familiales - Cnaf company and Rijkswaterstaat company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Caisse nationale des allocations familiales - Cnaf company and Rijkswaterstaat company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Caisse nationale des allocations familiales - Cnaf company and Rijkswaterstaat company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Caisse nationale des allocations familiales - Cnaf company and Rijkswaterstaat company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Caisse nationale des allocations familiales - Cnaf company and Rijkswaterstaat company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Caisse nationale des allocations familiales - Cnaf company and Rijkswaterstaat company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Caisse nationale des allocations familiales - Cnaf company and Rijkswaterstaat company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Caisse nationale des allocations familiales - Cnaf company and Rijkswaterstaat company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Caisse nationale des allocations familiales - Cnaf company and Rijkswaterstaat company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Caisse nationale des allocations familiales - Cnaf and Rijkswaterstaat, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Caisse nationale des allocations familiales - Cnaf and Rijkswaterstaat, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Caisse nationale des allocations familiales - Cnaf or Rijkswaterstaat ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Caisse nationale des allocations familiales - Cnaf or Rijkswaterstaat ?
Between Caisse nationale des allocations familiales - Cnaf and Rijkswaterstaat, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Caisse nationale des allocations familiales - Cnaf and Rijkswaterstaat, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-57980
SUMMARY

Authentication bypass using an alternate path or channel in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform tampering over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-56741
SUMMARY

JLine is a Java library for handling console input. Prior to 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1, the JLine3 Telnet server remote-telnet module does not apply an upper bound to terminal dimensions received via the Telnet NAWS option, and TelnetIO.handleNAWS() in TelnetIO.java:856-879 reads client-supplied width and height as 16-bit unsigned integers and passes values such as 65535x65535 to setTerminalGeometry(), allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to repeatedly alternate values and trigger continuous expensive rendering work that causes CPU exhaustion and denial of service. This issue is fixed in versions 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56740
SUMMARY

JLine is a Java library for handling console input. Prior to 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1, the JLine3 Telnet server remote-telnet module does not limit the number of environment variables a client may inject via the Telnet NEW-ENVIRON option, and TelnetIO.readNEVariables() in TelnetIO.java:1127-1180 stores each variable pair in a HashMap held by ConnectionData, allowing an unauthenticated attacker to flood unique variable pairs before the terminating IAC SE byte and exhaust JVM heap memory with an OutOfMemoryError. This issue is fixed in versions 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56171
SUMMARY

Exposure of private personal information to an unauthorized actor in Windows RDP allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-54335
SUMMARY

Feathersjs is a framework for creating web APIs and real-time applications with TypeScript or JavaScript. In 5.0.44 and earlier, the _.merge(target, source) utility exported by @feathersjs/commons recursively merges source into target by iterating Object.keys(source). When source was produced by JSON.parse and contains a __proto__, constructor, or prototype key, that key is returned as an own-enumerable property; the recursive merge then resolves target['__proto__'] to Object.prototype and writes attacker-supplied properties onto it, polluting the prototype for all plain objects in the process for the lifetime of the Node process. This issue is fixed in version 5.0.45.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2