Comparison Overview
California Department of State Hospitals
California Department of State Hospitals
1600 9th Street , Sacramento , CA, US, 95814
Last Update: 01/04/2026
The California Department of State Hospitals (DSH) is the nation’s largest forensic mental health hospital system, operating five hospital facilities across California, as well as a centralized office in Sacramento. We provide treatment to a diverse population of patien...
UAB Medicine
1802 6th Ave S, Birmingham, US
Last Update: 03/09/2026
As a nationally ranked academic medical center and one of Alabama’s largest employers, UAB Medicine is about teamwork, support, mentorship, and collaboration. Employees are empowered to lead, learn, and innovate as they deliver world-class care to every patient, every f...
Compliance Ranges Comparison
California Department of State Hospitals
UAB Medicine
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for California Department of State Hospitals in 2026.
Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for UAB Medicine in 2026.
Incident History - California Department of State Hospitals (X = Date, Y = Severity)
California Department of State Hospitals cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - UAB Medicine (X = Date, Y = Severity)
UAB Medicine cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents
California Department of State Hospitals
UAB Medicine
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.
IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.
IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.
IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.