Comparison Overview
CACI International Inc

CACI International Inc
12021 Sunset Hills Rd, Reston, 20190, US
Last Update: 13/09/2026
At CACI International Inc (NYSE: CACI), our 25,000 talented and dynamic employees are ever vigilant in delivering distinctive expertise and technology to meet our customers’ greatest challenges in national security. We are a company of good character, relentless innovat...

IBM
International Business Machines Corp., Armonk, New York, 10504, US
Last Update: 09/10/2026
At IBM, we do more than work. We create. We create as technologists, developers, and engineers. We create with our partners. We create with our competitors. If you're searching for ways to make the world work better through technology and infrastructure, software and co...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

CACI International Inc







IBM






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for CACI International Inc in 2026.
Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)
IBM has 1187.13% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - CACI International Inc (X = Date, Y = Severity)
CACI International Inc cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - IBM (X = Date, Y = Severity)
IBM cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

CACI International Inc

IBM
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
HTTP/2 servers could end up crashing due to inadvertently modifying its HPACK encoder concurrently. This happens because the server modifies the HPACK encoder from two goroutines without synchronization: one uses the encoder to encode a HEADERS frame as part of a response sent to a client and the other modifies the encoder's table size when handling a SETTINGS frame containing SETTINGS_HEADER_TABLE_SIZE that a client sends. A malicious client can repeatedly send a request while changing the header table size to crash the server.
Multiple ECH outer extension references are not permitted under RFC 9849; previously, a client could send a well-crafted packet that could trigger memory exhaustion in the server process by specifying multiple references. We now reject these as malformed and curb the memory amplification vector as a result.
A trusted template author may have previously written a valid template wherein the use of the 'yield' keyword would not be correctly escaped. We now ensure that valid keyword uses are escaped and non-keyword uses are not escaped.
Improper certificate validation in Microsoft Partner Center allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.
Authorization bypass through user-controlled key in Microsoft Bookings allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.